ArticleHuman brain mapping2013
Writing affects the brain network of reading in Chinese: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Connectome-based predictive modeling of handwriting and reading using task-evoked and resting-state functional connectivity.iScience · 2025Article
- Neural representation of sensorimotor features in language-motor areas during auditory and visual perception.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Event-related brain potentials in lexical processing with Chinese characters show effects of contextual diversity but not word frequency.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- A review of functional MRI application for brain research of Chinese language processing.Magnetic resonance letters · 2023Review
- Functional brain networks underlying the interaction between central and peripheral processes involved in Chinese handwriting in children and adults.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Brain Correlates of Chinese Handwriting and Their Relation to Reading Development in Children: An fMRI Study.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Functional connectivity during orthographic, phonological, and semantic processing of Chinese characters identifies distinct visuospatial and phonosemantic networks.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Neural representation of phonological information during Chinese character reading.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- The brain basis of handwriting deficits in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia.Developmental science · 2022Article
- Greater Similarity Between L1 and L2's Brain Network in Adults Than in Children.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Interference effects of radical markings and stroke order animations on Chinese character learning among L2 learners.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- A Comparative Study of Three Measurement Methods of Chinese Character Recognition for L2 Chinese Learners.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Exploring Orthographic Representation in Chinese Handwriting: A Mega-Study Based on a Pedagogical Corpus of CFL Learners.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Disruption of Functional Brain Networks Underlies the Handwriting Deficit in Children With Developmental Dyslexia.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- The Effects of Handwriting Experience on Literacy Learning.Psychological science · 2021Article
- The cortical organization of writing sequence: evidence from observing Chinese characters in motion.Brain structure & function · 2021Article
- The Differences in the Whole-Brain Functional Network between Cantonese-Mandarin Bilinguals and Mandarin Monolinguals.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Holistic processing of Chinese characters in college students with dyslexia.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- From Hand to Eye With the Devil In-Between: Which Cognitive Mechanisms Underpin the Benefit From Handwriting Training When Learning Visual Graphs?Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We examined the hypothesis that learning to write Chinese characters influences the brain's reading network for characters. Students from a college Chinese class learned 30 characters in a character-writing condition and 30 characters in a pinyin-writing condition. After learning, functional magnetic resonance imaging collected during passive viewing showed different networks for reading Chinese characters and English words, suggesting accommodation to the demands of the new writing system through short-term learning. Beyond these expected differences, we found specific effects of character writing in greater activation (relative to pinyin writing) in bilateral superior parietal lobules and bilateral lingual gyri in both a lexical decision and an implicit writing task. These findings suggest that character writing establishes a higher quality representation of the visual-spatial structure of the character and its orthography. We found a greater involvement of bilateral sensori-motor cortex (SMC) for character-writing trained characters than pinyin-writing trained characters in the lexical decision task, suggesting that learning by doing invokes greater interaction with sensori-motor information during character recognition. Furthermore, we found a correlation of recognition accuracy with activation in right superior parietal lobule, right lingual gyrus, and left SMC, suggesting that these areas support the facilitative effect character writing has on reading. Finally, consistent with previous behavioral studies, we found character-writing training facilitates connections with semantics by producing greater activation in bilateral middle temporal gyri, whereas pinyin-writing training facilitates connections with phonology by producing greater activation in right inferior frontal gyrus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.