ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2012
The brain matters: effects of descending signals on motor control.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Repetitive nociceptive stimulation elicits complex behavioral changes in Hirudo: evidence of arousal and motivational adaptations.The Journal of experimental biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Sensory-evoked perturbations of locomotor activity by sparse sensory input: a computational study.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
- Activity in descending dopaminergic neurons represents but is not required for leg movements in the fruit fly Drosophila.Physiological reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The ability of nerve cords and spinal cords to exhibit fictive rhythmic locomotion in the absence of the brain is well-documented in numerous species. Although the brain is important for modulating the fictive motor output, it is broadly assumed that the functional properties of neuronal circuits identified in simplified preparations are conserved with the brain attached. We tested this assumption by examining the properties of a novel interneuron recently identified in the leech (Hirudo verbana) nerve cord. This neuron, cell E21, initiates and drives stereotyped fictive swimming activity in preparations of the isolated leech nerve cord deprived of the head brain. We report that, contrary to expectation, the motor output generated when cell E21 is stimulated in preparations with the brain attached is highly variable. Swim frequency and episode duration are increased in some of these preparations and decreased in others. Cell E21 controls swimming, in part, via excitatory synaptic interactions with cells 204, previously identified gating neurons that reliably initiate and strongly enhance leech swimming activity when the brain is absent. We found that in preparations with the brain present, the magnitude of the synaptic interaction from cell E21 to cell 204 is reduced by 50% and that cell 204-evoked responses also were highly variable. Intriguingly, most of this variability disappeared in semi-intact preparations. We conclude that neuronal circuit properties identified in reduced preparations might be fundamentally altered from those that occur in more physiological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.