Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22378133›Full record

ArticleJournal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE2012

Tailoring information provision and consent processes to research contexts: the value of rapid assessments.

Susan Bull, Bobbie Farsides, Fasil Tekola Ayele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rapid Bioethical Assessment forEthiopian journal of health sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Editorial - ethical practice and genomic research.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susan BullThe Ethox Centre, Division of Public Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom. susan.bull@ethox.ox.ac.uk
Bobbie Farsides
Fasil Tekola Ayele

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HG999999Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HL999999Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999Wellcome Trust 068909Wellcome Trust 079791Wellcome Trust 087285Wellcome Trust 096527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guidance requires that consent processes for research be appropriately tailored to their cultural context. This paper discusses the use of rapid assessments to identify cultural and ethical issues arising when explaining research in studies in The Gambia and Ethiopia. The assessments provided insights into appropriate ways of providing information to minimize the risk of stigmatizing vulnerable research populations; research participants' views about the most important information to provide about research and their understandings of research; and perceived constraints upon reaching voluntary decisions about participation. These insights demonstrate that rapid assessments are a relatively quick and inexpensive intervention that can provide valuable information to assist in the tailoring of information provision and consent processes to research context while maintaining and enhancing participants' fundamental protections.

Indexed as

ComprehensionCultureInformed ConsentPatient Education as TopicResearch SubjectsBiomedical ResearchData CollectionEthiopiaGambiaHumans

Identifiers

PMID22378133
PMCPMC3427649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.