ArticleEURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology2012
A top-down approach to classify enzyme functional classes and sub-classes using random forest.
Article in EURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of enzyme function using an interpretable optimized ensemble learning framework.Chemical science · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Guided Protein Engineering.ACS catalysis · 2023Review
- Enzyme Promiscuity Prediction Using Hierarchy-Informed Multi-Label Classification.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Alignment-Free Method to Predict Enzyme Classes and Subclasses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Prediction of Enzyme Function Based on Three Parallel Deep CNN and Amino Acid Mutation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Article
- ECPred: a tool for the prediction of the enzymatic functions of protein sequences based on the EC nomenclature.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- DEEPre: sequence-based enzyme EC number prediction by deep learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- EnzyNet: enzyme classification using 3D convolutional neural networks on spatial representation.PeerJ · 2018Article
- Article
- Isofunctional Protein Subfamily Detection Using Data Integration and Spectral Clustering.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Article
- Prediction of detailed enzyme functions and identification of specificity determining residues by random forests.PloS one · 2014Article
- A survey of computational intelligence techniques in protein function prediction.International journal of proteomics · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancements in sequencing technologies have witnessed an exponential rise in the number of newly found enzymes. Enzymes are proteins that catalyze bio-chemical reactions and play an important role in metabolic pathways. Commonly, function of such enzymes is determined by experiments that can be time consuming and costly. Hence, a need for a computing method is felt that can distinguish protein enzyme sequences from those of non-enzymes and reliably predict the function of the former. To address this problem, approaches that cluster enzymes based on their sequence and structural similarity have been presented. But, these approaches are known to fail for proteins that perform the same function and are dissimilar in their sequence and structure. In this article, we present a supervised machine learning model to predict the function class and sub-class of enzymes based on a set of 73 sequence-derived features. The functional classes are as defined by International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Using an efficient data mining algorithm called random forest, we construct a top-down three layer model where the top layer classifies a query protein sequence as an enzyme or non-enzyme, the second layer predicts the main function class and bottom layer further predicts the sub-function class. The model reported overall classification accuracy of 94.87% for the first level, 87.7% for the second, and 84.25% for the bottom level. Our results compare very well with existing methods, and in many cases report better performance. Using feature selection methods, we have shown the biological relevance of a few of the top rank attributes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.