Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22375054›Full record

ReviewScience signaling2012

Chemoattractant signaling in dictyostelium: adaptation and amplification.

Pablo A Iglesias

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science signaling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Adaptation of Living Systems.Annual review of condensed matter physics · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Adaptive molecular networks controlling chemotactic migration: dynamic inputs and selection of the network architecture.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pablo A IglesiasDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. pi@jhu.edu

Funding

Computational Models of Cell DivisionR01GM086704 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI IGLESIAS, PABLO A., ROBINSON, DOUGLAS N · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The social amoebae Dictyostelium discoideum has long proved a powerful model organism for studying how cells sense and interpret chemoattractant gradients. Because of the rich behavior observed in its response to chemoattractants, as well as the complex nature of the signaling pathways involved, this research has attracted and benefited from the use of theoretical models. Recent quantitative experiments provide support for a popular model: the local excitation, global inhibition mechanism of gradient sensing. Here, I discuss these findings and suggest some important open problems.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalChemotactic FactorsDictyosteliumSignal TransductionChemotactic Factors

Identifiers

PMID22375054
PMCPMC6684029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.