Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22374427›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2012

Evaluation of ER-α, ER-Β1 and ER-Β2 expression and correlation with clinicopathologic factors in invasive luminal subtype breast cancers.

Huiming Zhang, Zhongtao Zhang, Lixue Xuan, Shan Zheng, Lei Guo, Qimin Zhan, Xiang Qu, Baoming Zhang, Yu Wang, Xiang Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. PeerJ · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Huiming ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Yong An Road, Beijing 100050, People's Republic of China.
Zhongtao Zhang
Lixue Xuan
Shan Zheng
Lei Guo
Qimin Zhan
Xiang Qu
Baoming Zhang
Yu Wang
Xiang Wang
Yongmei Song
Academy of Medical Sciences · GBChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNCapital Medical University · CNBeijing Friendship Hospital · CNCapital University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLuminal subtype breast cancer is defined as oestrogen receptor (ER)- and/or progesterone receptor (PR)- positive breast cancer. We detected the expression of ER-α, ER-Β1 and ER-Β2 in the tissue samples of invasive luminal subtype breast cancer patients, evaluated the correlations between these ER statuses and prognosis, and tried to clarify whether the status of ER-α isoforms provides clinically useful information further to what is already provided by the traditional ER-α/PR assay.

methodsThe expression of ER-α, ER-Β1 and ER-Β2 in the paraffin-embedded sections of 162 invasive luminal subtype breast cancer patients was detected with an immunohistochemical staining method. With mid-long-term follow-up, the features of ER-α, ER-Β1 and ER-Β2 status and the correlations between clinical characteristics and the prognosis were analysed.

resultsER-Β1-positive status was correlated with PR (rs=0.217, p<0.01). The median follow-up time was 92 months (range, 4-98 months). Univariate analysis suggested that ER-Β1 status was significantly correlated to diseasefree survival (DFS) time (log rank=3.98, p=0.046), especially in patients with positive lymph nodes (log rank=6.20, p=0.013). In patients with smaller tumour size (=20 mm), negative ER-Β2 status was significantly correlated to overall survival time (log rank=3.87, p=0.049).

conclusionsIn invasive luminal subtype breast cancers, ER-Β1 is correlated with good prognosis and could be regarded as one of the factors for evaluating DFS time, especially in lymph node-positive patients. There may be some interactions between ER-Β1 and PR. In clinical practice, besides routine detection of ER-α and PR in invasive luminal subtype breast cancers, immunohistochemical staining of ER-Β1 and ER-Β2 should be considered in order to achieve more useful information. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCarcinomaCohort StudiesEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor betaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingProtein IsoformsReceptors, ProgesteroneStatistics as TopicSurvival AnalysisESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor betaProtein IsoformsReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID22374427
OpenAlexW2063924945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.