Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22373075›Full record

ArticleBMC proceedings2011

Propensity score analysis in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 simulated data set on independent individuals.

Chen Min Lin, Fah J Sathirapongsasuti, Berit Kerner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC proceedings, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chen Min LinDepartment of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 695 Charles E, Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1761, USA. BKerner@mednet.ucla.edu.
Fah J Sathirapongsasuti
Berit Kerner

Funding

Symptom Dimensions in PsychosisK08MH074057 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KERNER, BERIT · 2005 to 2009
$872k
Parsing of Bipolar Disorders and Schizophrenia: A Latent Class ApproachR01MH085744 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KERNER, BERIT · 2010 to 2012
$723k
NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH074057NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 provided simulated phenotypes and exome sequence data for 697 independent individuals (209 case subjects and 488 control subjects). The disease liability in these data was influenced by multiple quantitative traits. We addressed the lack of statistical power in this small data set by limiting the genomic variants included in the study to those with potential disease-causing effect, thereby reducing the problem of multiple testing. After this adjustment, we could readily detect two common variants that were strongly associated with the quantitative trait Q1 (C13S523 and C13S522). However, we found no significant associations with the affected status or with any of the other quantitative traits, and the relationship between disease status and genomic variants remained obscure. To address the challenge of the multivariate phenotype, we used propensity scores to combine covariates with genetic risk factors into a single risk factor and created a new phenotype variable, the probability of being affected given the covariates. Using the propensity score as a quantitative trait in the case-control analysis, we again could identify the two common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (C13S523 and C13S522). In addition, this analysis captured the correlation between Q1 and the affected status and reduced the problem of multiple testing. Although the propensity score was useful for capturing and clarifying the genetic contributions of common variants to the disease phenotype and the mediating role of the quantitative trait Q1, the analysis did not increase power to detect rare variants.

Identifiers

PMID22373075
PMCPMC3287911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.