Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22372722›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurochemistry2012

Neuronal c-Jun is required for successful axonal regeneration, but the effects of phosphorylation of its N-terminus are moderate.

Crystal A Ruff, Nils Staak, Smriti Patodia, Mark Kaswich, Eridan Rocha-Ferreira, Clive Da Costa, Stephan Brecht, Milan Makwana, Xavier Fontana, Mariya Hristova and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurochemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Crystal A RuffPerinatal Brain Repair Group, Inst Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Nils Staak
Smriti Patodia
Mark Kaswich
Eridan Rocha-Ferreira
Clive Da Costa
Stephan Brecht
Milan Makwana
Xavier Fontana
Mariya Hristova
Prakasham Rumajogee
Matthias Galiano
Marion Bohatschek
Thomas Herdegen
Axel Behrens
Gennadij Raivich
University College London · GBChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DECancer Research UK · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council S20299, B/D009537/1Cancer Research UK 15679Wellcome Trust WT088646MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although neural c-Jun is essential for successful peripheral nerve regeneration, the cellular basis of this effect and the impact of c-Jun activation are incompletely understood. In the current study, we explored the effects of neuron-selective c-Jun deletion, substitution of serine 63 and 73 phosphoacceptor sites with non-phosphorylatable alanine, and deletion of Jun N-terminal kinases 1, 2 and 3 in mouse facial nerve regeneration. Removal of the floxed c-jun gene in facial motoneurons using cre recombinase under control of a neuron-specific synapsin promoter (junΔS) abolished basal and injury-induced neuronal c-Jun immunoreactivity, as well as most of the molecular responses following facial axotomy. Absence of neuronal Jun reduced the speed of axonal regeneration following crush, and prevented most cut axons from reconnecting to their target, significantly reducing functional recovery. Despite blocking cell death, this was associated with a large number of shrunken neurons. Finally, junΔS mutants also had diminished astrocyte and microglial activation and T-cell influx, suggesting that these non-neuronal responses depend on the release of Jun-dependent signals from neighboring injured motoneurons. The effects of substituting serine 63 and 73 phosphoacceptor sites (junAA), or of global deletion of individual kinases responsible for N-terminal c-Jun phosphorylation were mild. junAA mutants showed decrease in neuronal cell size, a moderate reduction in post-axotomy CD44 levels and slightly increased astrogliosis. Deletion of Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)1 or JNK3 showed delayed functional recovery; deletion of JNK3 also interfered with T-cell influx, and reduced CD44 levels. Deletion of JNK2 had no effect. Thus, neuronal c-Jun is needed in regeneration, but JNK phosphorylation of the N-terminus mostly appears to not be required for its function.

Indexed as

AnimalsAtrophyAxonsCell DeathFemaleHyaluronan ReceptorsMaleMiceMice, KnockoutMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 10Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 8Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 9Motor NeuronsNerve RegenerationNeuronsPhosphorylationHyaluronan ReceptorsMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 10Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 8Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 9Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-jun

Identifiers

PMID22372722
PMCPMC4491308
OpenAlexW1565728466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.