ReviewSeminars in diagnostic pathology2012
Beyond the 2008 World Health Organization classification: the role of the hematopathology laboratory in the diagnosis and management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Review in Seminars in diagnostic pathology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Advances in biology of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and therapeutic implications.American journal of blood research · 2018Review
- Recent advances and novel treatment paradigms in acute lymphocytic leukemia.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2016Review
- Acute kidney injury in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade hematological malignancies: impact on remission and survival.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is made by evaluating morphology and immunophenotype. However, appropriate risk stratification and decisions regarding the intensity of therapy are influenced by additional clinical and laboratory testing that reflect the biology of the disease. Recent years have seen tremendous progress in uncovering genetic lesions that influence the biology of ALL. In recognition of these advances, the 2008 WHO classification incorporated the category of B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma with recurrent genetic abnormalities into the classification of precursor lymphoid neoplasms. Based on the knowledge available at the time, genetic lesions associated with distinct clinical features, immunophenotype, prognosis, or other unique biological characteristics were included in this category. Not surprisingly, significant novel genetic lesions that profoundly affect the biology of ALL have since been identified and will have a major impact on risk stratification and may ultimately be incorporated into future classification schemes. After establishing an initial diagnosis and treatment regimen, hematopathologists must also evaluate for minimal residual disease (MRD) to determine the need for additional intervention because MRD remains the most useful clinical indicator of disease progression and response to treatment. Doing so requires familiarity with not only morphology, but also flow cytometry and molecular genetics. Although not all of these applications are handled directly by the hematopathologist, it is our strong belief that meaningful involvement in patient care dictates that hematopathologists appreciate all aspects of ALL diagnosis and disease monitoring. This review covers the salient aspects of recent advances in the biology of ALL and evaluation of MRD, placing emphasis on how this information may ultimately be used to improve risk stratification and, as a result, patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.