Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22371636›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2012

Rifaximin vs. conventional oral therapy for hepatic encephalopathy: a meta-analysis.

Karim M Eltawil, Marie Laryea, Kevork Peltekian, Michele Molinari

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04674176 (The Potential Weight Loss Benefits of Rifaximin in an Intermittent Fasting Diet), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04674176 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Potential Weight Loss Benefits of Rifaximin in an Intermittent Fasting Diet

TypeinterventionalSponsorBayhealth Medical CenterRan2021 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsWeight LossArmsRifaximin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Future Therapies of Hepatic Encephalopathy.Clinics in liver disease · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Hepatobiliary Quiz (Answers)-14 (2015).Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology · 2015
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karim M EltawilDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Marie Laryea
Kevork Peltekian
Michele Molinari
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo characterize the efficacy of rifaximin in the management of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) as several randomized controlled studies have shown contradictory results on its effectiveness in comparison to other oral agents.

methodsWe performed a systematic review and random effects meta-analysis of all eligible trials identified through electronic and manual searches. Twelve randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria with a total of 565 patients.

resultsThe clinical effectiveness of rifaximin was equivalent to disaccharides or other oral antibiotics [odds ratio (OR) 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94-4.08] but with a better safety profile (OR 0.27; 95% CI: 0.12-0.59). At the completion of treatment protocols, patients receiving rifaximin showed lower serum ammonia levels [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -10.65; 95% CI: -23.4-2.1; P = 0.10], better mental status (WMD = -0.24; 95% CI: -0.57-0.08; P = 0.15) and less asterixis (WMD -0.1; 95% CI -0.26-0.07; P = 0.25) without reaching statistical significance. On the other hand, other psychometric outcomes such as electroencephalographic response and grades of portosystemic encephalopathy were superior in patients treated with rifaximin in comparison to the control group (WMD = 0.21, 95% CI: -0.33-0.09, P = 0.0004; and WMD = -2.33, 95% CI: -2.68-1.98, P = 0.00001, respectively). Subgroup and sensitivity analysis did not show any significant difference in the above findings.

conclusionRifaximin appears to be at least as effective as other conventional oral agents for the treatment of HE with a better safety profile.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsDatabases, FactualDisaccharidesHepatic EncephalopathyHumansOdds RatioRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRifamycinsRifaximinTreatment OutcomeAnti-Infective AgentsDisaccharidesRifamycinsRifaximinHepatic encephalopathyLactuloseNeomycinNon-absorbable disaccharidesRifaximin

Identifiers

PMID22371636
PMCPMC3286139
OpenAlexW2138728561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.