Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22371527›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2012

Assessment of circadian rhythms in humans: comparison of real-time fibroblast reporter imaging with plasma melatonin.

Sibah Hasan, Nayantara Santhi, Alpar S Lazar, Ana Slak, June Lo, Malcolm von Schantz, Simon N Archer, Jonathan D Johnston, Derk-Jan Dijk

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Delayed sleep-wake phase disorder.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Sex differences in the circadian regulation of sleep and waking cognition in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sibah HasanSurrey Sleep Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Nayantara Santhi
Alpar S Lazar
Ana Slak
June Lo
Malcolm von Schantz
Simon N Archer
Jonathan D Johnston
Derk-Jan Dijk
University of Surrey · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F022883/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the period of the rhythm of plasma melatonin, driven by the hypothalamic circadian pacemaker, to in vitro periodicity in cultured peripheral fibroblasts to assess the effects on these rhythms of a polymorphism of PER3 (rs57875989), which is associated with sleep timing. In vitro circadian period was determined using luminometry of cultured fibroblasts, in which the expression of firefly luciferase was driven by the promoter of the circadian gene Arntl (Bmal1). The period of the melatonin rhythm was assessed in a 9-d forced desynchrony protocol, minimizing confounding effects of sleep-wake and light-dark cycles on circadian rhythmicity. In vitro periods (32 participants, 24.61±0.33 h, mean±SD) were longer than in vivo periods (31 participants, 24.16±0.17 h; P<0.0001) but did not differ between PER3 genotypes (P>0.4). Analyses of replicate in vitro assessments demonstrated that circadian period was reproducible within individuals (intraclass correlation=0.62), but in vivo and in vitro period assessments did not correlate (P>0.9). In accordance with circadian entrainment theory, in vivo period correlated with the timing of melatonin (P<0.05) at baseline and with diurnal preference (P<0.05). Individual circadian rhythms can be reliably assessed in fibroblasts but may not correlate with physiological rhythms driven by the central circadian pacemaker.

Indexed as

AdultARNTL Transcription FactorsCells, CulturedCircadian RhythmFemaleFibroblastsHumansMaleMelatoninMinisatellite RepeatsPeriod Circadian ProteinsReproducibility of ResultsARNTL Transcription FactorsBMAL1 protein, humanMelatoninPER3 protein, humanPeriod Circadian Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22371527
PMCPMC3360144
OpenAlexW2130866419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.