Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22371351›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2013

Direct stimulation of the autonomic nervous system modulates activity of the brain at rest and when engaged in a cognitive task.

Barbara Basile, Andrea Bassi, Giovanni Calcagnini, Stefano Strano, Carlo Caltagirone, Emiliano Macaluso, Pietro Cortelli, Marco Bozzali

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distinct Brain Systems Support Afferent and Efferent Autonomic Activity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Distinct brain systems support afferent and efferent autonomic activity.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Sympathetic and parasympathetic central autonomic networks.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Effect of parasympathetic stimulation on brain activity during appraisal of fearful expressions.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Orthostatic hypotension and cognitive impairment: a dangerous association?Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara BasileNeuroimaging Laboratory, Santa Lucia Foundation, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Andrea Bassi
Giovanni Calcagnini
Stefano Strano
Carlo Caltagirone
Emiliano Macaluso
Pietro Cortelli
Marco Bozzali
Fondazione Santa Lucia · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of autonomic perturbation (AP) on the central nervous system functioning is still largely unknown. Using an automated neck suction device to stimulate the carotid mechanoreceptors in the carotid sinus (parasympathetic pathway), operated synchronously with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) acquisition, we investigated the effects of AP on the activity of the brain at rest and when engaged in a visuo-spatial attention task. ECG was always recorded to index changes in autonomic function. At rest, AP induced increased activation in the insula and in the amygdala, which have been previously associated with the autonomic control and emotion processing, as well as in the caudate nucleus and in the medial temporal cortex, both implicated in cognitive functions. Despite a preserved performance during visuo-spatial attention task, AP induced increased reaction times and a positive modulation on the activation of the right posterior parietal cortex, the occipital cortex, the periaquiductal gray, and nuclei of the brainstem. We speculate that this modulation of brain activity represents, at different anatomical levels, a compensation mechanism to maintain cognitive efficiency under parasympathetic stimulation, which is traditionally considered as the system for energy regain and storage. In conclusion, this study provides the first evidence of a dynamic interaction between AP and higher level functions in humans.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAdultAfferent PathwaysAttentionAutonomic Nervous SystemBlood PressureBrainCognitionElectrocardiographyHeart RateHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeckNeuropsychological TestsOxygen

Identifiers

PMID22371351
PMCPMC6870143
OpenAlexW2086945676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.