Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22371319›Full record

Trial reportCancer2012

Phase II study of Gleevec plus hydroxyurea in adults with progressive or recurrent low-grade glioma.

David A Reardon, Annick Desjardins, James J Vredenburgh, James E Herndon, April Coan, Sridharan Gururangan, Katherine B Peters, Roger McLendon, Sith Sathornsumetee, Jeremy N Rich and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. A perioperative study of Safusidenib in patients withFuture oncology (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

David A ReardonThe Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. reard003@mc.duke.edu
Annick Desjardins
James J Vredenburgh
James E Herndon
April Coan
Sridharan Gururangan
Katherine B Peters
Roger McLendon
Sith Sathornsumetee
Jeremy N Rich
Eric S Lipp
Dorothea Janney
Henry S Friedman
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · USCleveland Clinic · USDuke University · USMahidol University · TH

Funding

TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENES IN HUMAN MEDULLOBLASTOMAP50NS020023 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BIGNER, DARELL D · 1985 to 2013
$17.3M
BRAIN TUMORS: IMMUNOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL STUDIESR37CA011898 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BIGNER, DARELL D · 1988 to 2012
$8.1M
NCI NIH HHS 4 R37 CA011898-42NCI NIH HHS R37 CA011898NINDS NIH HHS 5 P50 NS20023-29NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS020023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated the efficacy of imatinib plus hydroxyurea in patients with progressive/recurrent low-grade glioma.

methodsA total of 64 patients with recurrent/progressive low-grade glioma were enrolled in this single-center study that stratified patients into astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma cohorts. All patients received 500 mg of hydroxyurea twice a day. Imatinib was administered at 400 mg per day for patients not on enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) and at 500 mg twice a day if on EIAEDs. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 12 months (PFS-12) and secondary endpoints were safety, median progression-free survival, and radiographic response rate.

resultsThirty-two patients were enrolled into each cohort. Eleven patients (17%) had before radiotherapy and 24 (38%) had received before chemotherapy. The median PFS and PFS-12 were 11 months and 39%, respectively. Outcome did not differ between the histologic cohorts. No patient achieved a radiographic response. The most common grade 3 or greater adverse events were neutropenia (11%), thrombocytopenia (3%), and diarrhea (3%).

conclusionsImatinib plus hydroxyurea was well tolerated among recurrent/progressive LGG patients but this regimen demonstrated negligible antitumor activity.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAstrocytomaBenzamidesBrain NeoplasmsCohort StudiesDacarbazineDiarrheaDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBenzamidesDacarbazineHydroxyureaImatinib MesylatePiperazinesPyrimidinesTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID22371319
PMCPMC3748946
OpenAlexW2053997474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.