Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22370968›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2012

HIV therapies and the kidney: some good, some not so good?

Lene Ryom, Amanda Mocroft, Jens Lundgren

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. HIV medication-based urolithiasis.Clinical kidney journal · 2014
    Review
  10. Prevalence and risk factors of mild chronic renal failure in HIV-infected patients: influence of female gender and antiretroviral therapy.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lene RyomCopenhagen HIV Programme, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark. lrn@cphiv.dk
Amanda Mocroft
Jens Lundgren
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several observational studies have identified tenofovir as an independent risk factor for kidney impairment. Conversely, randomized trials have only demonstrated minor tenofovir-related changes in kidney function, but these studies included patients with normal kidney function and with low underling risk for progression of their renal function, had limited size, and limited follow-up. Several potential mechanisms of tenofovir nephrotoxicity are known. Atazanavir can, equally to indinavir, cause urolithiasis, but both drugs have also been associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and fast declining eGFR in persons without clinical symptoms of urolithiasis, especially when the plasma drug concentration is boosted by concomitant ritonavir use. In 2012, only a minority of HIV-positive individuals are affected by drug-induced nephrotoxicity. However, in the future, the clinical impact and hence the requirement for more research in this area will likely increase due to ageing and continued cART exposure of the HIV-positive population.

Indexed as

Anti-Retroviral AgentsHIV InfectionsHumansKidneyKidney DiseasesReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsAnti-Retroviral AgentsReverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID22370968
OpenAlexW2112442129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.