Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22370766›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2012

Primary care physician perceptions on caring for complex patients with medical and mental illness.

Danielle F Loeb, Elizabeth A Bayliss, Ingrid A Binswanger, Carey Candrian, Frank V deGruy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Scaling out a Digital-First Behavioral Health Care Model to Primary Care.Administration and policy in mental health · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Emergency Department Use among Patients with Mental Health Problems: Profiles, Correlates, and Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  20. Patient experiences with a primary care medical home tailored for people with serious mental illness.Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare · 2024
    Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle F LoebDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Academic Office 1; Mailstop B180; 12631 East 17th Ave., Aurora, CO 80045, USA. Danielle.loeb@ucdenver.edu
Elizabeth A Bayliss
Ingrid A Binswanger
Carey Candrian
Frank V deGruy
The Medical Center of Aurora · USKaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Drug-Related Risk for Death After Release from PrisonR21DA031041 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BINSWANGER, INGRID A · 2011 to 2012
$421k
HIV Risk Behavior in Drug-Involved Former InmatesR03DA029448 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BINSWANGER, INGRID A · 2010 to 2011
$305k
NIDA NIH HHS 1R03DA029448NIDA NIH HHS 1R21DA031041-01NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA029448NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA031041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental illness is common and associated with poor outcomes for co-occurring medical illness. Since primary care physicians manage the treatment of complex patients with both mental and medical illnesses, their perspectives on the care of these patients is vital to improving clinical outcomes.

objectiveTo examine physician perceptions of patient, physician and system factors that affect the care of complex patients with mental and medical illness.

designInductive, participatory, team-based qualitative analysis of transcripts of in-depth semi-structured interviews.

participantsFifteen internal medicine physicians from two university primary care clinics and three community health clinics.

resultsParticipant characteristics were balanced in terms of years in practice, practice site, and gender. Physicians identified contributing factors to the complexity of patient care within the domains of patient, physician and system factors. Physicians identified 1) type of mental illness, 2) acuity of mental illness, and 3) communication styles of individual patients as the principal patient characteristics that affected care. Physicians expressed concern regarding their own lack of medical knowledge, clinical experience, and communication skills in treating mental illness. Further, they discussed tensions between professionalism and emotional responses to patients. Participants expressed great frustration with the healthcare system centered on: 1) lack of mental health resources, 2) fragmentation of care, 3) clinic procedures, and 4) the national healthcare system.

conclusionsPhysicians in this study made a compelling case for increased training in the treatment of mental illness and improvements in the delivery of mental health care. Participants expressed a strong desire for increased integration of care through collaboration between primary care providers and mental health specialists. This approach could improve both comfort in treating mental illness and the delivery of care for complex patients.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPerceptionPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysicians, Primary CareAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID22370766
PMCPMC3403152
OpenAlexW2145855192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.