ReviewProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2012
Role of denosumab in prostate cancer.
Review in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis Detection and Prediction.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Small extracellular vesicles deliver osteolytic effectors and mediate cancer-induced osteolysis in bone metastatic niche.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2021Article
- Ras and Wnt Interaction Contribute in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Current and emerging therapies for bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer is known to have a tissue tropism for bone. This tissue tropism coupled with the experience with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) over the past decade has led to heightened awareness of bone complications. Osteopenia and subsequent skeletal-related events (SREs) are one of the more concerning repercussions of ADT along with cardiovascular sequelae. To combat this decrease in bone mineral density, several agents have been developed for bone protection. The largest experience is with bisphosphonates (BPs), but recently (2011) head to head trials have established the role of monoclonal antibodies, particularly in patients with prostate cancer bone metastasis. For patients initiating ADT, monthly denosumab increased bone mineral density, the time for occurrence of any bone metastasis and time for symptomatic bone metastasis. Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody of the IgG(2) subtype that selectively binds and neutralizes receptor activator NF kappa B ligand (RANKL), inhibiting osteoclastogenesis and bone turnover. In vitro binding assays have shown high-affinity binding of denosumab and osteoprotegerin to both soluble and membrane-bound forms of human RANKL. As clinicians may be less familiar with this newer agent, we compiled this review to summarize denosumab's current clinical indications for bone stabilization and mechanism of reduction in tumor burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.