ArticleBMC genomics2012
Detection of interacting transcription factors in human tissues using predicted DNA binding affinity.
Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- BestCRM: An Exhaustive Search for Optimal Cis-Regulatory Modules in Promoters Accelerated by the Multidimensional Hash Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- A genome-wide RNAi screen reveals essential therapeutic targets of breast cancer stem cells.EMBO molecular medicine · 2019Article
- Probing transcription factor combinatorics in different promoter classes and in enhancers.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Computational identification of tissue-specific transcription factor cooperation in ten cattle tissues.PloS one · 2019Article
- coTRaCTE predicts co-occurring transcription factors within cell-type specific enhancers.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Mitochondrial Complex I activity signals antioxidant response through ERK5.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Transcription factor activity rhythms and tissue-specific chromatin interactions explain circadian gene expression across organs.Genome research · 2018Article
- Removing Background Co-occurrences of Transcription Factor Binding Sites Greatly Improves the Prediction of Specific Transcription Factor Cooperations.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Article
- Transcriptome difference and potential crosstalk between liver and mammary tissue in mid-lactation primiparous dairy cows.PloS one · 2017Article
- HTS-Net: An integrated regulome-interactome approach for establishing network regulation models in high-throughput screenings.PloS one · 2017Article
- PC-TraFF: identification of potentially collaborating transcription factors using pointwise mutual information.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- MKL1/2 and ELK4 co-regulate distinct serum response factor (SRF) transcription programs in macrophages.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- TACO: a general-purpose tool for predicting cell-type-specific transcription factor dimers.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Comprehensive prediction in 78 human cell lines reveals rigidity and compactness of transcription factor dimers.Genome research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTissue-specific gene expression is generally regulated by combinatorial interactions among transcription factors (TFs) which bind to the DNA. Despite this known fact, previous discoveries of the mechanism that controls gene expression usually consider only a single TF.
resultsWe provide a prediction of interacting TFs in 22 human tissues based on their DNA-binding affinity in promoter regions. We analyze all possible pairs of 130 vertebrate TFs from the JASPAR database. First, all human promoter regions are scanned for single TF-DNA binding affinities with TRAP and for each TF a ranked list of all promoters ordered by the binding affinity is created. We then study the similarity of the ranked lists and detect candidates for TF-TF interaction by applying a partial independence test for multiway contingency tables. Our candidates are validated by both known protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and known gene regulation mechanisms in the selected tissue. We find that the known PPIs are significantly enriched in the groups of our predicted TF-TF interactions (2 and 7 times more common than expected by chance). In addition, the predicted interacting TFs for studied tissues (liver, muscle, hematopoietic stem cell) are supported in literature to be active regulators or to be expressed in the corresponding tissue.
conclusionsThe findings from this study indicate that tissue-specific gene expression is regulated by one or two central regulators and a large number of TFs interacting with these central hubs. Our results are in agreement with recent experimental studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.