ArticleBMC genomics2011
Cutoff Scanning Matrix (CSM): structural classification and function prediction by protein inter-residue distance patterns.
Article in BMC genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- COCFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Characterization of a thermostable uricase derived fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- piscesCSM: prediction of anticancer synergistic drug combinations.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Article
- DDMut-PPI: predicting effects of mutations on protein-protein interactions using graph-based deep learning.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Deep-PK: deep learning for small molecule pharmacokinetic and toxicity prediction.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- DDAffinity: predicting the changes in binding affinity of multiple point mutations using protein 3D structure.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- DDMut: predicting effects of mutations on protein stability using deep learning.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- epitope1D: accurate taxonomy-aware B-cell linear epitope prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Exploring the conformational dynamics and thermodynamics ofOpen life sciences · 2023Article
- Propedia v2.3: A novel representation approach for the peptide-protein interaction database using graph-based structural signatures.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Using Graph-Based Signatures to Guide Rational Antibody Engineering.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Evaluating hierarchical machine learning approaches to classify biological databases.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- cropCSM: designing safe and potent herbicides with graph-based signatures.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Searching for plant-derived antivirals against dengue virus and Zika virus.Virology journal · 2022Article
- CSM-carbohydrate: protein-carbohydrate binding affinity prediction and docking scoring function.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- pdCSM-cancer: Using Graph-Based Signatures to Identify Small Molecules with Anticancer Properties.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2021Article
- mmCSM-PPI: predicting the effects of multiple point mutations on protein-protein interactions.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Structural basis of the human Scribble-Vangl2 association in health and disease.The Biochemical journal · 2021Article
- Prediction of rifampicin resistance beyond the RRDR using structure-based machine learning approaches.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Network-based protein structural classification.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe unforgiving pace of growth of available biological data has increased the demand for efficient and scalable paradigms, models and methodologies for automatic annotation. In this paper, we present a novel structure-based protein function prediction and structural classification method: Cutoff Scanning Matrix (CSM). CSM generates feature vectors that represent distance patterns between protein residues. These feature vectors are then used as evidence for classification. Singular value decomposition is used as a preprocessing step to reduce dimensionality and noise. The aspect of protein function considered in the present work is enzyme activity. A series of experiments was performed on datasets based on Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and mechanistically different enzyme superfamilies as well as other datasets derived from SCOP release 1.75.
resultsCSM was able to achieve a precision of up to 99% after SVD preprocessing for a database derived from manually curated protein superfamilies and up to 95% for a dataset of the 950 most-populated EC numbers. Moreover, we conducted experiments to verify our ability to assign SCOP class, superfamily, family and fold to protein domains. An experiment using the whole set of domains found in last SCOP version yielded high levels of precision and recall (up to 95%). Finally, we compared our structural classification results with those in the literature to place this work into context. Our method was capable of significantly improving the recall of a previous study while preserving a compatible precision level.
conclusionsWe showed that the patterns derived from CSMs could effectively be used to predict protein function and thus help with automatic function annotation. We also demonstrated that our method is effective in structural classification tasks. These facts reinforce the idea that the pattern of inter-residue distances is an important component of family structural signatures. Furthermore, singular value decomposition provided a consistent increase in precision and recall, which makes it an important preprocessing step when dealing with noisy data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.