Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22369183›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2011

Predicting sequence and structural specificities of RNA binding regions recognized by splicing factor SRSF1.

Xin Wang, Liran Juan, Junjie Lv, Kejun Wang, Jeremy R Sanford, Yunlong Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. SRSF1 and PTBP1 AreMolecular and cellular biology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xin WangCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Indiana University School of Medicine, IN 46202, USA.
Liran Juan
Junjie Lv
Kejun Wang
Jeremy R Sanford
Yunlong Liu
Harbin Engineering University · CNIndiana University · USIndiana University School of MedicineUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

Genomic analysis of RNA binding protein target specificityR01GM085121 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI SANFORD, JEREMY ROBERT · 2008 to 2010
$1.1M
Elucidating CIS-Acting Elements Regulating Alcohol-Induced Alternative SplicingR21AA017941 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI EDENBERG, HOWARD J, LIU, YUNLONG · 2009 to 2010
$424k
NCI NIH HHS CA113001NIAAA NIH HHS AA017941NIGMS NIH HHS GM085121NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play diverse roles in eukaryotic RNA processing. Despite their pervasive functions in coding and noncoding RNA biogenesis and regulation, elucidating the sequence specificities that define protein-RNA interactions remains a major challenge. Recently, CLIP-seq (Cross-linking immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing) has been successfully implemented to study the transcriptome-wide binding patterns of SRSF1, PTBP1, NOVA and fox2 proteins. These studies either adopted traditional methods like Multiple EM for Motif Elicitation (MEME) to discover the sequence consensus of RBP's binding sites or used Z-score statistics to search for the overrepresented nucleotides of a certain size. We argue that most of these methods are not well-suited for RNA motif identification, as they are unable to incorporate the RNA structural context of protein-RNA interactions, which may affect to binding specificity. Here, we describe a novel model-based approach--RNAMotifModeler to identify the consensus of protein-RNA binding regions by integrating sequence features and RNA secondary structures.

resultsAs an example, we implemented RNAMotifModeler on SRSF1 (SF2/ASF) CLIP-seq data. The sequence-structural consensus we identified is a purine-rich octamer 'AGAAGAAG' in a highly single-stranded RNA context. The unpaired probabilities, the probabilities of not forming pairs, are significantly higher than negative controls and the flanking sequence surrounding the binding site, indicating that SRSF1 proteins tend to bind on single-stranded RNA. Further statistical evaluations revealed that the second and fifth bases of SRSF1octamer motif have much stronger sequence specificities, but weaker single-strandedness, while the third, fourth, sixth and seventh bases are far more likely to be single-stranded, but have more degenerate sequence specificities. Therefore, we hypothesize that nucleotide specificity and secondary structure play complementary roles during binding site recognition by SRSF1.

conclusionIn this study, we presented a computational model to predict the sequence consensus and optimal RNA secondary structure for protein-RNA binding regions. The successful implementation on SRSF1 CLIP-seq data demonstrates great potential to improve our understanding on the binding specificity of RNA binding proteins.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBase PairingBinding SitesModels, StatisticalNuclear ProteinsNucleic Acid ConformationRNARNA-Binding ProteinsROC CurveSerine-Arginine Splicing FactorsNuclear ProteinsRNARNA-Binding ProteinsSerine-Arginine Splicing Factors

Identifiers

PMID22369183
PMCPMC3287504
OpenAlexW2094205892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.