Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22368245›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2012

A Bayesian approach to targeted experiment design.

J Vanlier, C A Tiemann, P A J Hilbers, N A W van Riel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Information geometry for multiparameter models: new perspectives on the origin of simplicity.Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Investigating Active Learning and Meta-Learning for Iterative Peptide Design.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2021
    Article
  9. Optimal experimental design for mathematical models of haematopoiesis.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Bayesian inference for dynamical systems.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. How to deal with parameters for whole-cell modelling.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J VanlierDepartment of BioMedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. j.vanlier@tue.nl
C A Tiemann
P A J Hilbers
N A W van Riel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSystems biology employs mathematical modelling to further our understanding of biochemical pathways. Since the amount of experimental data on which the models are parameterized is often limited, these models exhibit large uncertainty in both parameters and predictions. Statistical methods can be used to select experiments that will reduce such uncertainty in an optimal manner. However, existing methods for optimal experiment design (OED) rely on assumptions that are inappropriate when data are scarce considering model complexity.

resultsWe have developed a novel method to perform OED for models that cope with large parameter uncertainty. We employ a Bayesian approach involving importance sampling of the posterior predictive distribution to predict the efficacy of a new measurement at reducing the uncertainty of a selected prediction. We demonstrate the method by applying it to a case where we show that specific combinations of experiments result in more precise predictions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code is available at: http://bmi.bmt.tue.nl/sysbio/software/pua.html.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremUncertaintyAlgorithmsJanus KinasesMonte Carlo MethodProgramming LanguagesResearch DesignSignal TransductionSTAT Transcription FactorsSystems BiologyJanus KinasesSTAT Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22368245
PMCPMC3324513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.