ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2013
[TEAM®-G (Trauma Evaluation and Management Germany). Serves as a basis for an interdisciplinary training in the emergency room].
Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Care of critically ill nontrauma patients in the resuscitation room].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2022Review
- [Hospital-based acute care of emergency patients: the importance of interdisciplinary teamwork].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe implementation of ATLS® in the daily routine of trauma management in the emergency department is a challenge. This goal cannot be reached by educating ATLS® to a few team members only. In order to enforce the implementation of ATLS® in a level I trauma centre, a generic in-house training was introduced in 2009 with inter-professional integration of all specialists of the trauma team. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe TEAM® course (trauma evaluation and management concept of the American College of Surgeons) was the theoretical basis of the training. This educational program was developed for medical students and multidisciplinary team members. Prior training, a questionnaire for self-assessment was completed by n=84 team members to assess their knowledge about ATLS® principles. The hands-on training time was 90 min. N=10 members of the trauma team worked out three scenarios of multiple injured patients. These were provided as near-reality manikin simulations by a specialist trainer. After the training participants re-evaluated and analysed improvement by the training. Duration of trauma management and the number of missed injuries were analysed one year prior and one year after the training and served as a marker of the process and outcome quality of trauma care.
resultsPrior the training, 57% of trainees specified their knowledge related to the ATLS® can be improved. Their expectations were generally satisfied by the training. The mean time of trauma management in the ED could not be reduced one year after the training (36±16 min) compared to one year prior the training (39±18 min), however, the detection of missed injuries (5.6% vs. 3.2%, p<0.05) was significantly diminished after the training.
conclusionApart form education of ATLS® providers the inauguration of an interdisciplinary and interprofessionel team training may enhance implementation of ATLS- algorithms into daily routine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22367522What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.