Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22367438›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2012

Genome-wide two-locus epistasis scans in prostate cancer using two European populations.

Sha Tao, Junjie Feng, Timothy Webster, Guangfu Jin, Fang-Chi Hsu, Shyh-Huei Chen, Seong-Tae Kim, Zhong Wang, Zheng Zhang, Siqun L Zheng and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Large-Scale Genome-Wide Gene-Gene Interaction Study of Lung Cancer Susceptibility in Europeans With a Trans-Ethnic Validation in Asians.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sha TaoCenter for Genetic Epidemiology and Prevention, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Junjie Feng
Timothy Webster
Guangfu Jin
Fang-Chi Hsu
Shyh-Huei Chen
Seong-Tae Kim
Zhong Wang
Zheng Zhang
Siqun L Zheng
William B Isaacs
Jianfeng Xu
Jielin Sun

Funding

TRANSGENIC MODELS FOR PROSTATE CANCER AND AUTOIMMUNITYP50CA058236 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DENMEADE, SAMUEL R · 1992 to 2020
$43.9M
Confirmation of SNPs Associated with Aggressive PCa in a GWA StudyR01CA129684 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI XU, JIANFENG · 2008 to 2011
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA129684NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 40 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are associated with prostate cancer (PCa) risk have been identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, these GWAS-identified PCa risk-associated SNPs can explain only a small proportion of heritability (~13%) of PCa risk. Gene-gene interaction is speculated to be one of the major factors contributing to the so-called missing heritability. To evaluate the gene-gene interaction and PCa risk, we performed a two-stage genome-wide gene-gene interaction scan using a novel statistical approach named "Boolean Operation-based Screening and Testing". In the first stage, we exhaustively evaluated all pairs of SNP-SNP interactions for ~500,000 SNPs in 1,176 PCa cases and 1,101 control subjects from the National Cancer Institute Cancer Genetic Markers of Susceptibility (CGEMS) study. No SNP-SNP interaction reached a genome-wide significant level of 4.4E-13. The second stage of the study involved evaluation of the top 1,325 pairs of SNP-SNP interactions (P(interaction) <1.0E-08) implicated in CGEMS in another GWAS population of 1,964 PCa cases from the Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) and 3,172 control subjects from the Illumina iControl database. Sixteen pairs of SNP-SNP interactions were significant in the JHH population at a P(interaction) cutoff of 0.01. However, none of the 16 pairs of SNP-SNP interactions were significant after adjusting for multiple tests. The current study represents one of the first attempts to explore the high-dimensional etiology of PCa on a genome-wide scale. Our results suggested a list of SNP-SNP interactions that can be followed in other replication studies.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsWhite People

Identifiers

PMID22367438
PMCPMC3634576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.