Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22367392›Full record

ReviewThe EMBO journal2012

Protease signalling: the cutting edge.

Boris Turk, Dušan Turk, Vito Turk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The EMBO journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Proteases: Role in Various Human Diseases.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Taurine drives body protein renewal and accretion in beef steers.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Generation of Protease Inhibitory Antibodies by Functional In Vivo Selection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Boris TurkDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular and Structural Biology, Jozef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia. boris.turk@ijs.si
Dušan Turk
Vito Turk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protease research has undergone a major expansion in the last decade, largely due to the extremely rapid development of new technologies, such as quantitative proteomics and in-vivo imaging, as well as an extensive use of in-vivo models. These have led to identification of physiological substrates and resulted in a paradigm shift from the concept of proteases as protein-degrading enzymes to proteases as key signalling molecules. However, we are still at the beginning of an understanding of protease signalling pathways. We have only identified a minor subset of true physiological substrates for a limited number of proteases, and their physiological regulation is still not well understood. Similarly, links with other signalling systems are not well established. Herein, we will highlight current challenges in protease research.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAnimalsHumansMicePeptide HydrolasesProteolysisProteomicsSubstrate SpecificityPeptide Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID22367392
PMCPMC3321211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.