ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2012
Current insights in invasive group A streptococcal infections in pediatrics.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Ethical bioprospecting and microbial assessments for sustainable solutions to the AMR crisis.IUBMB life · 2025Review
- Acute Glomerulonephritis Following Systemic Scabies in Two Brothers.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Clinical and Laboratory Features of Invasive Group A Streptococcal Infections: 8 Years Experience.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Skin infections in Australian Aboriginal children: a narrative review.The Medical journal of Australia · 2020Review
- Outcome of Severe Bacterial Pneumonia in the Era of Pneumococcal Vaccination.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A rising incidence of invasive group A Streptococcus infections (IGASI) has been noted in children in the past three decades. The relative frequency of the infection types showed marked differences to IGASI in adults, and severity of the disease resulted in a mortality rate usually comprising between 3.6% and 8.3%. The emm1-type group A Streptococcus (GAS) subclone displaying a particular pattern of virulence factors was widely disseminated and prevalent in children with IGASI while the emm3-type GAS subclone appeared as a recent emerging genotype. However, the implication of these hypervirulent clones in the increase of IGASI in children is still controversial. Recent advances in our knowledge on pathogenesis of IGASI underlined that deregulation of virulence factor production, individual susceptibility, as well as exuberant cytokine response are important factors that may account for the severity of the disease in children. Future changes in IGASI epidemiology are awaited from current prospects for a safe and effective vaccine against GAS. IGASI are complex infections associating septic, toxic, and immunological disorders. Treatment has to be effective on both the etiologic agent and its toxins, due to the severity of the disease associated to the spread of highly virulent bacterial clones. More generally, emergence of virulent clones responsible for septic and toxic disease is a matter of concern in pediatric infectiology in the absence of vaccination strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.