Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22366930›Full record

SynthesisSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2012

[Undesired side effects of tapentadol in comparison to oxycodone. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled comparative studies].

M Merker, G Dinges, T Koch, P Kranke, A M Morin

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Cancer pain management: what's new?Current pain and headache reports · 2013
    Review
  8. [Prescription of high-potency opioids in 2011].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M MerkerKlinik für Anästhesie und Intensivtherapie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, Marburg, Germany.
G Dinges
T Koch
P Kranke
A M Morin
Philipps University of Marburg · DEEuropean Neuroendocrine Tumor Society · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTapentadol is a new centrally acting analgesic with a dual mode of action as an agonist of the µ-opioid receptor and as a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the results from randomized controlled trials investigating the relative amount of adverse effects using tapentadol or oxycodone for the treatment of pain.

methodsA quantitative systematic review was carried out according to the PRISMA recommendations on randomized controlled trials comparing tapentadol and oxycodone in pain treatment. The incidences of typical adverse side effects of opioid-based analgesic therapy (e.g. nausea, vomiting, obstipation or pruritus) were extracted and the pooled relative risks (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

resultsA total of 9 trials involving 7,948 patients were included and of these 2,810 patients were treated with oxycodone and 5,138 were treated with tapentadol in equivalent analgesic dosages as documented by an equivalent analgesic effect. The risk of typical opioid-based adverse effects, such as nausea (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.57-0.66), vomiting (RR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.41-0.60), obstipation (RR 0.47, 95%-CI 0.40-0.56), dizziness (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.95), somnolence (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.86) and pruritus (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.37-0.58) was reduced when tapentadol was used for analgesic treatment. These adverse effects were investigated in all nine trials. The risk for dryness of the mouth (6 trials, 6,218 patients, RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.40-2.29) and dyspepsia (1 trial, 646 patients, RR 2.75, 95% CI 1.09-6.94) was increased when tapentadol was used instead of oxycodone. There were no significant differences in the relative risk for any other investigated adverse effect such as dysentery, headache or fatigue.

conclusionThe results show that using tapentadol significantly reduces the risk of the typical opioid-based adverse effects compared with oxycodone while providing equivalent analgesic treatment.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAnalgesics, OpioidDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleHumansOxycodonePainPhenolsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRiskTapentadolAnalgesics, OpioidOxycodonePhenolsTapentadol

Identifiers

PMID22366930
OpenAlexW108001267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.