ReviewDer Nervenarzt2013
[Frontotemporal dementias].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of Marte Meo® counselling with people with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and their primary carers (AMEO-FTD) - a non-randomized mixed-method feasibility study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2020Article
- [Neurocognitive disorders in DSM-5: pervasive changes in the diagnostics of dementia].Der Nervenarzt · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Frontotemporal dementias (FTD) account for only 5-7% of all dementia aetiologies. However, FTD is one common form of dementia in the presenile period with a symptom onset between an age of 45 and 65 years. FTD are clinically classified into a group of rare genetic variants, the behavioural variant, primary progressive aphasias and a variant including motor neuron symptoms (FTD-MNS). In recent years the pathobiological characteristics of some FTD variants was clarified, demonstrating a pathological accumulation of TAR-DNA binding protein 43 (TDP-43) as a common pathological substrate. The revised diagnostic criteria of the behavioural variant of the FTD require at least three of six clinically discriminating features (disinhibition, apathy, loss of sympathy, perseverative behaviours, hyperorality and dysexecutive neuropsychological profile). The primary progressive aphasias are classified in a nonfluent/agrammatic variant, a logopenic variant and a semantic variant according to clinical and imaging features. Movement disorders and more precisely a Parkinsonian syndrome can be part of the FTD spectrum. Some clinical features overlap the clinical diagnosis of a progressive supranuclear paralysis and the corticobasal ganglionic degeneration. A causal therapy does not exist and medical treatment is directed at the patient's key symptoms. Different agents such as serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, atypical neuroleptics, carbamazepine, valproate, lamotrigine and when indicated also acetylcholinesterase inhibitors are potentially helpful. All together, theses medical treatments have a low level of evidence. Non-pharmacological therapies such as physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy and disease-specific education of the patient and their relatives are important to ensure a safe residential environment and daily routine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.