Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22365776›Full record

ArticleMethods in enzymology2012

Retroviral replicating vectors in cancer.

Christopher R Logg, Joan M Robbins, Douglas J Jolly, Harry E Gruber, Noriyuki Kasahara

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in enzymology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Next-generation therapeutics for glioblastoma: Challenges and future directions.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Optimal delivery of RNA interference by viral vectors for cancer therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher R LoggDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Joan M Robbins
Douglas J Jolly
Harry E Gruber
Noriyuki Kasahara
Retriev Technologies (United States) · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Translational Development of Replication-Competent Retrovirus VectorsU01NS059821 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KASAHARA, NORIYUKI · 2010 to 2013
$2.9M
Cellular Transduction with Replication-Competent Retrovirus VectorsR01CA121258 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KASAHARA, NORIYUKI · 2007 to 2011
$2.3M
Combining Virotherapy and Immunotherapy for CancerR01CA105171 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KASAHARA, NORIYUKI · 2004 to 2008
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105171NCI NIH HHS R01 CA121258NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS059821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of replication-competent viruses for the treatment of cancer is an emerging technology that shows significant promise. Among the various different types of viruses currently being developed as oncolytic agents, retroviral replicating vectors (RRVs) possess unique characteristics that allow highly efficient, non-lytic, and tumor-selective gene transfer. By retaining all of the elements necessary for viral replication, RRVs are capable of transmitting genes via exponential in situ amplification. Their replication-competence also provides a powerful means whereby novel and useful RRV variants can be generated using natural selection. Their stringent requirement for cell division in order to achieve productive infection, and their preferential replication in cells with defective innate immunity, confer a considerable degree of natural specificity for tumors. Furthermore, their ability to integrate stably into the genome of cancer cells, without immediate cytolysis, contributes to long-lasting therapeutic efficacy. Thus, RRVs show much promise as therapeutic agents for cancer and are currently being tested in the clinic. Here we describe experimental methods for their production and quantitation, for adaptive evolution and natural selection to develop novel or improved RRV, and for in vitro and in vivo assessment of the therapeutic efficacy of RRVs carrying prodrug activator genes for treatment of cancer.

Indexed as

Virus ReplicationAnimalsBiotransformationCalibrationCell SurvivalClinical Trials as TopicCloning, MolecularDirected Molecular EvolutionDNAGenetic TherapyHEK293 CellsHumansMiceMice, NudeNeoplasmsOncolytic VirotherapyDNAProdrugs

Identifiers

PMID22365776
PMCPMC7197216
OpenAlexW2405564815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.