Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22364928›Full record

ArticleTrends in genetics : TIG2012

Does stress induce (para)sex? Implications for Candida albicans evolution.

Judith Berman, Lilach Hadany

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetic and environmental control of parasexual reproduction in the pathogenicMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Parasexuality ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Unraveling HowJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  14. The Magnitude ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Judith BermanDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology & Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Lilach Hadany
Tel Aviv University · ILUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Genome Integrity in Candida albicansR01AI062427 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI BERMAN, JUDITH G. · 2005 to 2014
$3.6M
NIAID NIH HHS AI0624273NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI062427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theory predicts that stress is a key factor in explaining the evolutionary role of sex in facultatively sexual organisms, including microorganisms. Organisms capable of reproducing both sexually and asexually are expected to mate more frequently when stressed, and such stress-induced mating is predicted to facilitate adaptation. Here, we propose that stress has an analogous effect on the parasexual cycle in Candida albicans, which involves alternation of generations between diploid and tetraploid cells. The parasexual cycle can generate high levels of diversity, including aneuploidy, yet it apparently occurs only rarely in nature. We review the evidence that stress facilitates four major steps in the parasexual cycle and suggest that parasex occurs much more frequently under stress conditions. This may explain both the evolutionary significance of parasex and its apparent rarity.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSexAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsCandida albicansHumansModels, BiologicalRecombination, GeneticReproduction, AsexualSexual BehaviorStress, Physiological

Identifiers

PMID22364928
PMCPMC3340477
OpenAlexW1981107479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.