Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22364419›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2012

Long-term outcome following imatinib therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia, with assessment of dosage and blood levels: the JALSG CML202 study.

Kazunori Ohnishi, Chiaki Nakaseko, Jin Takeuchi, Shin Fujisawa, Tadashi Nagai, Hirohito Yamazaki, Tetsuzo Tauchi, Kiyotoshi Imai, Naoki Mori, Fumiharu Yagasaki and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Kazunori OhnishiOncology Center, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan. kohnishi@hama-med.ac.jp
Chiaki Nakaseko
Jin Takeuchi
Shin Fujisawa
Tadashi Nagai
Hirohito Yamazaki
Tetsuzo Tauchi
Kiyotoshi Imai
Naoki Mori
Fumiharu Yagasaki
Yasuhiro Maeda
Noriko Usui
Yasushi Miyazaki
Koichi Miyamura
Hitoshi Kiyoi
Shigeki Ohtake
Tomoki Naoe
Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group
Kanazawa University · JPNagoya University · JPChiba University Hospital · JPHamamatsu University · JPJapanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hospital · JPJichi Medical University · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPKindai University · JPNagasaki University · JPNihon University · JPSaitama Medical University · JPSapporo Hokuyu Hospital · JPTokyo Medical University · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JPYokohama City University Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prospective multicenter Phase II study was performed to examine the efficacy and safety of imatinib therapy in newly diagnosed Japanese patients with chronic-phase CML. Patients were scheduled to receive imatinib 400 mg daily. Plasma imatinib concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. In 481 evaluable patients, estimated 7-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) at a median follow-up of 65 months were 93% and 87%, respectively. Because imatinib dosage was reduced in many patients due mainly to adverse events, subgroup analysis was performed according to the mean daily dose during the first 24 months of treatment: ≥360 mg (400-mg group; n = 294), 270-359 mg (300-mg group; n = 90) and <270 mg (200-mg group; n = 67). There were no significant differences in OS and EFS between the 300- and 400-mg groups; however, cumulative rates of complete cytogenetic and major molecular responses differed significantly between the two groups. There were no significant differences in mean imatinib trough levels between these two groups for the patients in whom trough levels had been measured. Survival and efficacy in the 200-mg group were markedly inferior to the former two groups. These results suggest that, although a daily dose of 400 mg imatinib is associated with better outcomes, 300 mg imatinib may be adequate for a considerable number of Japanese patients who are intolerant to 400 mg imatinib. Blood level monitoring would be useful to determine the optimal dose of imatinib.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFusion Proteins, bcr-ablHumansImatinib MesylateLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesFusion Proteins, bcr-ablImatinib MesylatePiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID22364419
PMCPMC7685081
OpenAlexW2018358459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.