ArticleBMC microbiology2012
Influence of wet distillers grains diets on beef cattle fecal bacterial community structure.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Meta-analysis of Bacterial Diversity in the Feces of Cattle.Current microbiology · 2016Pooled it
- Single-contig bacterial genomes recovered from cattle fecal metagenomes at farms with variable antibiotic use.Research square · 2026Article
- Cattle feces are a reservoir of diverse Acinetobacter species with potential to spread antibiotic resistance genes.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- Distillers' grains as alternative feed resources for beef cattle: review.Animal bioscience · 2026Article
- Fermented total mixed ration enhances nutrient digestibility and modulates the milk components and fecal microbial community in lactating Holstein dairy cows.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Growth Performance and Fecal Microbiota of Dairy Calves Supplemented with Autochthonous Lactic Acid Bacteria as Probiotics in Mexican Western Family Dairy Farming.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- - Invited Review - Assessment of the gastrointestinal microbiota using 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing in ruminant nutrition.Animal bioscience · 2023Article
- Dietary protein levels modulate the gut microbiome composition through fecal samples derived from lactating ewes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Influence of olive cake dietary supplementation on fecal microbiota of dairy cows.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- The impact of different diets and genders on fecal microbiota in Hanwoo cattle.Journal of animal science and technology · 2022Article
- Administration of probiotic lactic acid bacteria to modulate fecal microbiome in feedlot cattle.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Composition of Fecal Microbiota in Grazing and Feedlot Angus Beef Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Characterizing the fecal bacteria and archaea community of heifers and lactating cows through 16S rRNA next-generation sequencing.Journal of applied genetics · 2020Article
- Effects of Paper Mulberry Silage on the Milk Production, Apparent Digestibility, Antioxidant Capacity, and Fecal Bacteria Composition in Holstein Dairy Cows.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Antibiotic resistomes discovered in the gut microbiomes of Korean swine and cattle.GigaScience · 2020Article
- Fecal bacterial community of finishing beef steers fed ruminally protected and non-protected active dried yeast.Journal of animal science · 2020Article
- Raw milk and fecal microbiota of commercial Alpine dairy cows varies with herd, fat content and diet.PloS one · 2020Article
- Investigation of tylosin in feed of feedlot cattle and effects on liver abscess prevalence, and fecal and soil microbiomes and resistomes1.Journal of animal science · 2019Article
- Response of Beef Cattle Fecal Microbiota to Grazing on Toxic Tall Fescue.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2019Article
- Fecal Microbial Communities in a Large Representative Cohort of California Dairy Cows.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe high demand for ethanol in the U.S. has generated large stocks of wet distillers grains (DG), a byproduct from the manufacture of ethanol from corn and sorghum grains. Little is known, however, about the potential influence of dietary DG on fecal microbial community structure. A better understanding of the microbial population in beef cattle feces could be an important monitoring tool to facilitate goals of improving nutrient management, increasing animal growth performance and decreasing odors and/or shedding of pathogens. Five diets consisting of a traditional diet fed to finishing beef cattle in the Southern High Plains of Texas-CON (steam-flaked corn control with 0% DG), and four concentrations of DG in the dietary dry matter; 10 C (10% corn-based DG), 5S (5% sorghum-based DG), 10S (10% sorghum DG), and 15S (15% sorghum DG) were fed to steers at the Texas Tech University Burnett Animal Center. Diets were essentially isonitrogenous with a formulated crude protein value of 13.5%.
resultsFecal grab samples were obtained from 20 steers (n = 4 per diet) and the barcoded DNA pyrosequencing method was used to generate 127,530 16S operational taxonomic units (OTUs). A total of 24 phyla were observed, distributed amongst all beef cattle on all diets, revealing considerable animal to animal variation, however only six phyla (core set) were observed in all animals regardless of dietary treatment. The average abundance and range of abundance, respectively of the core phyla were as follows: Firmicutes (61%, 19 to 83%), Bacteroidetes (28%, 11 to 63%), Proteobacteria (3%, 0.34 to 17.5%), Tenericutes (0.15%, 0.0 to 0.35%), Nitrospirae (0.11%, 0.03 to 0.22%), and Fusobacteria (0.086%, 0.017 to 0.38%). Feeding DG-based diets resulted in significant shifts in the fecal microbial community structure compared with the traditional CON. Four low abundance phyla significantly responded to dietary treatments: Synergistetes (p = 0.01), WS3 (p = 0.054), Actinobacteria (p = 0.06), and Spirochaetes (p = 0.06).
conclusionsThis is, to our knowledge, the first study using this method to survey the fecal microbiome of beef cattle fed various concentrations of wet DG. Comparison of our results with other cattle DNA sequencing studies of beef and dairy cattle feces from a variety of geographical locations and different management practices identifies a core set of three phyla shared across all cattle. These three phyla, in order of relative abundance are; Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria. The presence of large animal-to-animal variation in cattle microbiome was noted in our study as well as by others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.