ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2012
Measuring binding of protein to gel-bound ligands using magnetic levitation.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamically Rotating Magnetic Levitation to Characterize the Spatial Density Heterogeneity of Materials.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- A Magnetic Levitation System for Range/Sensitivity-Tunable Measurement of Density.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Path-Dependent Self-Assembly of Magnetic Anisotropic Colloidal Peanuts.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2020Article
- MRBLES 2.0: High-throughput generation of chemically functionalized spectrally and magnetically encoded hydrogel beads using a simple single-layer microfluidic device.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2020Article
- Quantitative mapping of protein-peptide affinity landscapes using spectrally encoded beads.eLife · 2019Article
- Label-Free Microfluidic Manipulation of Particles and Cells in Magnetic Liquids.Advanced functional materials · 2016Article
- Magnetic Levitational Assembly for Living Material Fabrication.Advanced healthcare materials · 2015Article
- Levitational Image Cytometry with Temporal Resolution.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2015Article
- Article
- Magnetic levitation as a platform for competitive protein-ligand binding assays.Analytical chemistry · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This paper describes the use of magnetic levitation (MagLev) to measure the association of proteins and ligands. The method starts with diamagnetic gel beads that are functionalized covalently with small molecules (putative ligands). Binding of protein to the ligands within the bead causes a change in the density of the bead. When these beads are suspended in a paramagnetic aqueous buffer and placed between the poles of two NbFeB magnets with like poles facing, the changes in the density of the bead on binding of protein result in changes in the levitation height of the bead that can be used to quantify the amount of protein bound. This paper uses a reaction-diffusion model to examine the physical principles that determine the values of rate and equilibrium constants measured by this system, using the well-defined model system of carbonic anhydrase and aryl sulfonamides. By tuning the experimental protocol, the method is capable of quantifying either the concentration of protein in a solution, or the binding affinities of a protein to several resin-bound small molecules simultaneously. Since this method requires no electricity and only a single piece of inexpensive equipment, it may find use in situations where portability and low cost are important, such as in bioanalysis in resource-limited settings, point-of-care diagnosis, veterinary medicine, and plant pathology. It still has several practical disadvantages. Most notably, the method requires relatively long assay times and cannot be applied to large proteins (>70 kDa), including antibodies. The design and synthesis of beads with improved characteristics (e.g., larger pore size) has the potential to resolve these problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.