ArticleISRN dermatology2011
The pathogenesis of Candida infections in a human skin model: scanning electron microscope observations.
Article in ISRN dermatology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive analysis of human keratinocyte interactions withVirulence · 2025Article
- Citywide metagenomic surveillance of food centres reveals local microbial signatures and antibiotic resistance gene enrichment.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2025Article
- COVID-19-Associated Candidiasis: Possible Patho-Mechanism, Predisposing Factors, and Prevention Strategies.Current microbiology · 2022Review
- Development and Optimization of Luliconazole Spanlastics to Augment the Antifungal Activity againstPharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Article
- Validation of biofilm formation on human skin wound models and demonstration of clinically translatable bacteria-specific volatile signatures.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Methodologies forMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous candidiasis is an opportunistic infection that arises, in most cases, from endogenous, saprophytic candidal blastospores that selectively colonize oral, gastrointestinal, vaginal, and cutaneous epithelium. Candida albicans has been regarded as the most common causative agent in human fungal infections. However, other Candida species have become a significant cause of infection. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations were used to analyze the capability of C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis to adhere to human skin model, used in this study, which was found to mimic the human skin in vivo. The skin sections were inoculated with low and high concentration of the yeasts and followed for 1 and 5 days; then they were viewed by SEM. The electron microscopy observations revealed that all three yeasts tested adhered to the skin but C. albicans covered the entire skin model to a higher extent than C. tropicalis or C. parapsilosis. Mucin-like material coated the blastoconidia mainly in C. albicans. All Candida species have shown characteristics resembling biofilm formation. The use of human skin sections for ex vivo evaluation of adherence of various yeasts may partially explain the predominance of C. albicans in cutaneous pathogenicity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.