ArticlePloS one2012
The prevalence and cost of unapproved uses of top-selling orphan drugs.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Making modafinil: Classification and serendipity in drug development.Social studies of science · 2025Article
- Navigating health policies and programs in India: exploring opportunities to improve rare disease management and orphan drug research.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Review
- Special FDA designations for drug development: orphan, fast track, accelerated approval, priority review, and breakthrough therapy.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024Review
- Inequities in kidney health and kidney care.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2023Review
- Pharmaceutical policy and innovation for rare diseases: A narrative review.F1000Research · 2023Review
- Navigating the U.S. health insurance landscape for children with rare diseases: a qualitative study of parents' experiences.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Article
- Spending For Orphan Indications Among Top-Selling Orphan Drugs Approved To Treat Common Diseases.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2021Article
- Integrative Review of Managed Entry Agreements: Chances and Limitations.PharmacoEconomics · 2020Review
- Indications for Rituximab Use in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2020Observational
- The Clinical Trials Portfolio for On-label and Off-label Studies of Eculizumab.JAMA internal medicine · 2020Review
- The European challenges of funding orphan medicinal products.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2018Article
- Ethical imperatives of timely access to orphan drugs: is possible to reconcile economic incentives and patients' health needs?Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2017Article
- Biomarker-Defined Subsets of Common Diseases: Policy and Economic Implications of Orphan Drug Act Coverage.PLoS medicine · 2017Article
- Off-label use of orphan medicinal products: a Belgian qualitative study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2016Article
- Off-label use of the expensive orphan drug eculizumab in France 2009-2013 and the impact of literature: focus on the transplantation field.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Article
- Profitability and Market Value of Orphan Drug Companies: A Retrospective, Propensity-Matched Case-Control Study.PloS one · 2016Article
- Payers' Views of the Changes Arising through the Possible Adoption of Adaptive Pathways.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2016Article
- Outcomes of off-label drug uses in hospitals: a multicentric prospective study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Article
- Pharmaceutical pricing, cost containment and new treatments for rare diseases in children.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2014Review
- Reconciling uncertainty of costs and outcomes with the need for access to orphan medicinal products: a comparative study of managed entry agreements across seven European countries.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe Orphan Drug Act encourages drug development for rare conditions. However, some orphan drugs become top sellers for unclear reasons. We sought to evaluate the extent and cost of approved and unapproved uses of orphan drugs with the highest unit sales.
methodsWe assessed prescription patterns for four top-selling orphan drugs: lidocaine patch (Lidoderm) approved for post-herpetic neuralgia, modafinil (Provigil) approved for narcolepsy, cinacalcet (Sensipar) approved for hypercalcemia of parathyroid carcinoma, and imatinib (Gleevec) approved for chronic myelogenous leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumor. We pooled patient-specific diagnosis and prescription data from two large US state pharmaceutical benefit programs for the elderly. We analyzed the number of new and total patients using each drug and patterns of reimbursement for approved and unapproved uses. For lidocaine patch, we subcategorized approved prescriptions into two subtypes of unapproved uses: neuropathic pain, for which some evidence of efficacy exists, and non-neuropathic pain.
resultsWe found that prescriptions for lidocaine patch, modafinil, and cinacalcet associated with non-orphan diagnoses rose at substantially higher rates (average monthly increases in number of patients of 14.6, 1.45, and 1.58) than prescriptions associated with their orphan diagnoses (3.12, 0.24, and 0.03, respectively (p<0.001 for all)). By contrast, for imatinib, approved uses increased significantly over off-label (0.97 vs. 0.47 patients, p<0.001). Spending on off-label uses was highest for lidocaine patch and modafinil (>75%). Increases in lidocaine patch use for non-neuropathic pain far exceeded neuropathic pain (10.2 vs. 3.6 patients, p<0.001). DISCUSSION: In our sample, three of four top-selling orphan drugs were used more commonly for non-orphan indications. These orphan drugs treated common clinical symptoms (pain and fatigue) or laboratory abnormalities. We should continue to monitor orphan drug use after approval to identify products that come to be widely used for non-FDA approved indications, particularly those without adequate evidence of efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.