Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22363762›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

The prevalence and cost of unapproved uses of top-selling orphan drugs.

Aaron S Kesselheim, Jessica A Myers, Daniel H Solomon, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer, Raisa Levin, Jerry Avorn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Special FDA designations for drug development: orphan, fast track, accelerated approval, priority review, and breakthrough therapy.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Review
  4. Inequities in kidney health and kidney care.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Indications for Rituximab Use in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2020
    Observational
  10. Review
  11. The European challenges of funding orphan medicinal products.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aaron S KesselheimDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America. akesselheim@partners.org
Jessica A Myers
Daniel H Solomon
Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Raisa Levin
Jerry Avorn
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USStanford University · US

Funding

HARVARD CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE CENTER (UL1)UL1RR025758 · NCRR · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2008 to 2011
$91.4M
Patient Centered Outcomes Research in RheumatologyK24AR055989 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SOLOMON, DANIEL HAL · 2008 to 2017
$1.5M
Off-label prescribing: Comparative evidence, regulation, and utilizationK08HS018465 · AHRQ · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KESSELHEIM, AARON SETH · 2009 to 2013
$797k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS018465AHRQ HHS K08HS18465-01NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR 025758NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025758NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR055989NIAMS NIH HHS K24-AR055989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Orphan Drug Act encourages drug development for rare conditions. However, some orphan drugs become top sellers for unclear reasons. We sought to evaluate the extent and cost of approved and unapproved uses of orphan drugs with the highest unit sales.

methodsWe assessed prescription patterns for four top-selling orphan drugs: lidocaine patch (Lidoderm) approved for post-herpetic neuralgia, modafinil (Provigil) approved for narcolepsy, cinacalcet (Sensipar) approved for hypercalcemia of parathyroid carcinoma, and imatinib (Gleevec) approved for chronic myelogenous leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumor. We pooled patient-specific diagnosis and prescription data from two large US state pharmaceutical benefit programs for the elderly. We analyzed the number of new and total patients using each drug and patterns of reimbursement for approved and unapproved uses. For lidocaine patch, we subcategorized approved prescriptions into two subtypes of unapproved uses: neuropathic pain, for which some evidence of efficacy exists, and non-neuropathic pain.

resultsWe found that prescriptions for lidocaine patch, modafinil, and cinacalcet associated with non-orphan diagnoses rose at substantially higher rates (average monthly increases in number of patients of 14.6, 1.45, and 1.58) than prescriptions associated with their orphan diagnoses (3.12, 0.24, and 0.03, respectively (p<0.001 for all)). By contrast, for imatinib, approved uses increased significantly over off-label (0.97 vs. 0.47 patients, p<0.001). Spending on off-label uses was highest for lidocaine patch and modafinil (>75%). Increases in lidocaine patch use for non-neuropathic pain far exceeded neuropathic pain (10.2 vs. 3.6 patients, p<0.001). DISCUSSION: In our sample, three of four top-selling orphan drugs were used more commonly for non-orphan indications. These orphan drugs treated common clinical symptoms (pain and fatigue) or laboratory abnormalities. We should continue to monitor orphan drug use after approval to identify products that come to be widely used for non-FDA approved indications, particularly those without adequate evidence of efficacy.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalBenzhydryl CompoundsCinacalcetCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansLidocaineModafinilNaphthalenesNeuralgiaOff-Label UseOrphan Drug ProductionPrescription DrugsPublic HealthUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBenzhydryl CompoundsCinacalcetLidocaineModafinilNaphthalenesPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID22363762
PMCPMC3283698
OpenAlexW2142690026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.