Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22363612›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Prolactin secretion in healthy adults is determined by gender, age and body mass index.

Ferdinand Roelfsema, Hanno Pijl, Daniel M Keenan, Johannes D Veldhuis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Plasma prolactin and symptoms of schizophrenia.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Neuropsychological complications of hypoprolactinemia.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ferdinand RoelfsemaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. f.roelfsema@lumc.nl
Hanno Pijl
Daniel M Keenan
Johannes D Veldhuis
Leiden University Medical Center · NLMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProlactin (PRL) secretion is quantifiable as mean, peak and nadir PRL concentrations, degree of irregularity (ApEn, approximate entropy) and spikiness (brief staccato-like fluctuations). HYPOTHESIS: Distinct PRL dynamics reflect relatively distinct (combinations of) subject variables, such as gender, age, and BMI. LOCATION: Clinical Research Unit. SUBJECTS: Seventy-four healthy adults aged 22-77 yr (41 women and 33 men), with BMI 18.3-39.4 kg/m(2). MEASURES: Immunofluorometric PRL assay of 10-min samples collected for 24 hours.

resultsMean 24-h PRL concentration correlated jointly with gender (P<0.0001) and BMI (P = 0.01), but not with age (overall R(2) = 0.308, P<0.0001). Nadir PRL concentration correlated with gender only (P = 0.017) and peak PRL with gender (P<0.001) and negatively with age (P<0.003), overall R(2) = 0.325, P<0.0001. Forward-selection multivariate regression of PRL deconvolution results demonstrated that basal (nonpulsatile) PRL secretion tended to be associated with BMI (R(2) = 0.058, P = 0.03), pulsatile secretion with gender (R(2) = 0.152, P = 0.003), and total secretion with gender and BMI (R(2) = 0.204, P<0.0001). Pulse mass was associated with gender (P = 0.001) and with a negative tendency to age (P = 0.038). In male subjects older than 50 yr (but not in women) approximate entropy was increased (0.942±0.301 vs. 1.258±0.267, P = 0.007) compared with younger men, as well as spikiness (0.363±0.122 vs. 0463±2.12, P = 0.031). Cosinor analysis disclosed higher mesor and amplitude in females than in men, but the acrophase was gender-independent. The acrophase was determined by age and BMI (R(2) = 0.186, P = 0.001).

conclusionIn healthy adults, selective combinations of gender, age, and BMI specify distinct PRL dynamics, thus requiring balanced representation of these variables in comparative PRL studies.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexHealthSex CharacteristicsAdultAgedAgingFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPostmenopausePremenopauseProlactinTime FactorsYoung AdultProlactin

Identifiers

PMID22363612
PMCPMC3281966
OpenAlexW1988226520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.