Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22363561›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Effect of Lactobacillus salivarius bacteriocin Abp118 on the mouse and pig intestinal microbiota.

Eliette Riboulet-Bisson, Mark H J Sturme, Ian B Jeffery, Michelle M O'Donnell, B Anne Neville, Brian M Forde, Marcus J Claesson, Hugh Harris, Gillian E Gardiner, Patrick G Casey and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Bacteriocins fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Genomic Characterization of the Honeybee-Probiotic StrainAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. UnderstandingFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Combination of autochthonousFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Effect of Bacteriocins on the Intestinal Microbiota.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2023
    Article
  20. Review

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Eliette Riboulet-BissonDepartment of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Mark H J Sturme
Ian B Jeffery
Michelle M O'Donnell
B Anne Neville
Brian M Forde
Marcus J Claesson
Hugh Harris
Gillian E Gardiner
Patrick G Casey
Peadar G Lawlor
Paul W O'Toole
R Paul Ross
University College Cork · IETeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IEUniversity of Minho · PTWaterford Institute of Technology · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactobacilli are gram-positive bacteria that are a subdominant element in the human gastrointestinal microbiota, and which are commonly used in the food industry. Some lactobacilli are considered probiotic, and have been associated with health benefits. However, there is very little culture-independent information on how consumed probiotic microorganisms might affect the entire intestinal microbiota. We therefore studied the impact of the administration of Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118, a microorganism well characterized for its probiotic properties, on the composition of the intestinal microbiota in two model animals. UCC118 has anti-infective activity due to production of the bacteriocin Abp118, a broad-spectrum class IIb bacteriocin, which we hypothesized could impact the microbiota. Mice and pigs were administered wild-type (WT) L. salivarius UCC118 cells, or a mutant lacking bacteriocin production. The microbiota composition was determined by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons from faeces. The data show that L. salivarius UCC118 administration had no significant effect on proportions of major phyla comprising the mouse microbiota, whether the strain was producing bacteriocin or not. However, L. salivarius UCC118 WT administration led to a significant decrease in Spirochaetes levels, the third major phylum in the untreated pig microbiota. In both pigs and mice, L. salivarius UCC118 administration had an effect on Firmicutes genus members. This effect was not observed when the mutant strain was administered, and was thus associated with bacteriocin production. Surprisingly, in both models, L. salivarius UCC118 administration and production of Abp118 had an effect on gram-negative microorganisms, even though Abp118 is normally not active in vitro against this group of microorganisms. Thus L. salivarius UCC118 administration has a significant but subtle impact on mouse and pig microbiota, by a mechanism that seems at least partially bacteriocin-dependent.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial AdhesionBacteriocinsFecesFeeding BehaviorFemaleGastrointestinal TransitHumansIntestinal MucosaIntestinesMetagenomeMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMicrobial ViabilityModels, AnimalMutationABP-118 protein, Lactobacillus salivariusBacteriocins

Identifiers

PMID22363561
PMCPMC3281923
OpenAlexW1975301516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.