Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22363442›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

A symmetric dual feedback system provides a robust and entrainable oscillator.

Kazuhiro Maeda, Hiroyuki Kurata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kazuhiro MaedaDepartment of Bioscience and Bioinformatics, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Iizuka, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hiroyuki Kurata

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many organisms have evolved molecular clocks to anticipate daily changes in their environment. The molecular mechanisms by which the circadian clock network produces sustained cycles have extensively been studied and transcriptional-translational feedback loops are common structures to many organisms. Although a simple or single feedback loop is sufficient for sustained oscillations, circadian clocks implement multiple, complicated feedback loops. In general, different types of feedback loops are suggested to affect the robustness and entrainment of circadian rhythms. To reveal the mechanism by which such a complex feedback system evolves, we quantify the robustness and light entrainment of four competing models: the single, semi-dual, dual, and redundant feedback models. To extract the global properties of those models, all plausible kinetic parameter sets that generate circadian oscillations are searched to characterize their oscillatory features. To efficiently perform such analyses, we used the two-phase search (TPS) method as a fast and non-biased search method and quasi-multiparameter sensitivity (QMPS) as a fast and exact measure of robustness to uncertainty of all kinetic parameters.So far the redundant feedback model has been regarded as the most robust oscillator, but our extensive analysis corrects or overcomes this hypothesis. The dual feedback model, which is employed in biology, provides the most robust oscillator to multiple parameter perturbations within a cell and most readily entrains to a wide range of light-dark cycles. The kinetic symmetry between the dual loops and their coupling via a protein complex are found critically responsible for robust and entrainable oscillations. We first demonstrate how the dual feedback architecture with kinetic symmetry evolves out of many competing feedback systems.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalOscillometryAnimalsCircadian ClocksCircadian RhythmDrosophila melanogasterModels, BiologicalProbability

Identifiers

PMID22363442
PMCPMC3282687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.