Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22362381›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2012

The epigenetic silencing of the estrogen receptor (ER) by hypermethylation of the ESR1 promoter is seen predominantly in triple-negative breast cancers in Indian women.

Jyothi S Prabhu, Kanu Wahi, Aruna Korlimarla, Marjorrie Correa, Suraj Manjunath, N Raman, B S Srinath, T S Sridhar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. 14-3-3τ drives estrogen receptor loss via ERα36 induction and GATA3 inhibition in breast cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. JAK-STAT core cancer pathway: An integrative cancer interactome analysis.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2022
    Review
  6. Epigenetic Mechanisms in Canine Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Sex, epilepsy, and epigenetics.Neurobiology of disease · 2014
    Review
  11. Association of promoter methylation of ERα and ERβ with sporadic breast cancer--a study from North India.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jyothi S PrabhuDivision of Molecular Medicine, St. John's Research Institute, Koramangala, Bangalore, India. jyothisprabhu@gmail.com
Kanu Wahi
Aruna Korlimarla
Marjorrie Correa
Suraj Manjunath
N Raman
B S Srinath
T S Sridhar
St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences · INSt.John's Medical College Hospital · INSt. John's University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proportion of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative and triple-negative (TN) breast cancer in Indian women is higher than that reported in the West, and this difference persists even after their migration to the West. The causes for this significant difference are not entirely clear. Hypermethylation of the ER promoter, an epigenetic alteration, is known to be one of the mechanisms by which the expression of ER is suppressed. Two thirds of breast cancer specimens from an Indian center tested, using the highly sensitive, methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) technique, were reported positive. We have used a quantitative assay, the MethyLight, to better assess the extent of methylation in the ESR1 promoter region in 98 breast cancer tumor specimens from Indian women. In addition, the amount of ER transcripts was determined by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Using the stringent cutoff of at least 4% of the target sequence being methylated, 27% of TN tumors were methylated. In addition they demonstrated the highest levels of methylation. In contrast less than 2% ER-positive tumors were hypermethylated. While the proportion of hypermethylated tumors are lower in this study than that estimated using MSP, our results support the notion of increased epigenetic deregulations in ER-negative tumors in general and TN tumors in particular. The development of this assay also permits a rational approach to the selection of patients for clinical trials examining the efficacy of demethylating agents in the treatment of ER-negative breast cancer.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticGene SilencingAgedBreast NeoplasmsCpG IslandsDNA MethylationEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic TechniquesHumansIndiaMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionPromoter Regions, GeneticEstrogen Receptor alpha

Identifiers

PMID22362381
OpenAlexW2044181294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.