Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22362354›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Immunology2012

Beyond pattern recognition: five immune checkpoints for scaling the microbial threat.

J Magarian Blander, Leif E Sander

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neonatal CD19Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Microbial trash to metabolic treasure.Immunometabolism (Cobham, Surrey) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The danger theory of immunity revisited.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J Magarian BlanderMount Sinai School of Medicine, Immunology Institute, Department of Medicine, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10029, USA. Julie.blander@mssm.edu
Leif E Sander

Funding

Control of protective immunity by innate pathways sensing bacterial viabilityR01AI095245 · NIAID · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI BLANDER, JULIE MAGARIAN · 2012 to 2015
$1.7M
Innate Immune Sensing of Microbial ViabilityR21AI080959 · NIAID · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI BLANDER, JULIE MAGARIAN · 2009 to 2010
$466k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI095245NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI080959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pattern recognition by the innate immune system enables the detection of microorganisms, but how the level of microbial threat is evaluated - a process that is crucial for eliciting measured antimicrobial responses with minimal inflammatory tissue damage - is less well understood. New evidence has shown that features of microbial viability can be detected by the immune system and thereby induce robust responses that are not warranted for dead microorganisms. Here, we propose five immune checkpoints that, as defined here, collectively determine the gravity of microbial encounters.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImmunity, InnateInfectionsInflammationPhagocytosisReceptors, Pattern RecognitionVirulence FactorsReceptors, Pattern RecognitionVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID22362354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.