Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22362054›Full record

ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2012

Lynch syndrome: clinical, pathological, and genetic insights.

Ralph Schneider, Claudia Schneider, Matthias Kloor, Alois Fürst, Gabriela Möslein

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endometrial cancer and microsatellite instability status.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2015
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Colorectal carcinoma: Pathologic aspects.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ralph SchneiderDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Claudia Schneider
Matthias Kloor
Alois Fürst
Gabriela Möslein
St. Josefs Hospital · DECaritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef · DEHeidelberg University · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLynch syndrome as the most common hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome and the most common cause of hereditary endometrial cancer is characterized by an autosomal dominant inheritance with a penetrance of 85-90%. The molecular genetic underlying mechanism is a mutation in one of the mismatch repair genes.

methodsIn order to identify patients with Lynch syndrome, a nuclear family history should be ascertained and matched with the Amsterdam criteria. A different approach for identification is the adherence to Bethesda criteria and subsequent testing for microsatellite instability. In patients with unstable tumors as an indicator for mismatch repair deficiency, genetic counseling and mutation analysis are warranted. For families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria, intensified screening is recommended, even if a pathogenic mutation is not identified.

resultsIndividuals from families with a proven pathogenic mutation that are tested negative are at normal population risk for cancers and may be dismissed from intensified surveillance. Prophylactic surgery in high-risk individuals without neoplasia is not generally recommended. At the time of a colon primary, however, extended surgery should be discussed in the light of a high rate of metachronous cancers. The worries of impairing functional results have now been evaluated in the light of quality of life in a large international cohort. Interestingly, extended (prophylactic) surgery does not lead to inferior quality of life with equal perioperative risks.

conclusionsTherefore, taking the risk reduction into account, extended surgery at the time of the first colon primary should at least be discussed, if not recommended. Also, prophylactic hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy at the time of a colorectal primary should be recommended if family planning has been completed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCell Transformation, NeoplasticColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA Mismatch RepairDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedPedigree

Identifiers

PMID22362054
OpenAlexW2044548268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.