Trial reportGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2012
Short- and mid-term repeatability of macular pigment optical density measurements using spectral fundus reflectance.
Trial report in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bayer Filter Snapshot Hyperspectral Fundus Camera for Human Retinal Imaging.Current eye research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral methods have been proposed for measuring macular pigment optical density (MPOD). To date, none of the realized techniques can be considered as "gold standard". A key issue for the clinical applicability of a method is its repeatability. In this study, we investigated short- and mid-term repeatability of MPOD measurements using reflectometry.
methodsA total of 12 healthy young subjects were measured 5 times on 5 consecutive days. Repeatability over 6 months was investigated in patients with AMD. The data in AMD patients were taken from a recently published placebo controlled study investigating the effect of lutein supplementation on MPOD (n = 37; [1]). Four measurements over 6 months were used to calculate repeatability. Spectral fundus reflectance of the fovea was measured in a 2.3° detection field with a custom-built fundus reflectometer. Calculation of MPOD was based on a previously published fundus reflectance model.
resultsThe coefficients of variation were 6.2 ± 2.4% and 8.0 ± 5.5% in the healthy and AMD group, respectively. Bland-Altman plots indicate that the difference between measurements at day 1 and day 5 in healthy subjects and day 1 and month 6 in AMD patients was small. The maximum deviation in MPOD in a healthy subject was 0.07 (22.6%), and 0.17 (51.5%) in a patient with AMD.
conclusionsReflectometry provides adequate short-term and mid-term repeatability for measuring MPOD. Accordingly, the technique makes it possible to monitor MPOD in patients with AMD and to study the influence of supplementation in these subjects. In addition, the variability of the technique is small enough to allow for clinical trials with reasonable sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.