Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22361631›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2012

Phenformin as prophylaxis and therapy in breast cancer xenografts.

M V C L Appleyard, K E Murray, P J Coates, S Wullschleger, S E Bray, N M Kernohan, S Fleming, D R Alessi, A M Thompson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Re/Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Oral intake of bucillamine, carvedilol, metformin, or phenformin does not protect against UVR-induced squamous cell carcinomas in hairless mice.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Targeting Cancer Metabolism and Current Anti-Cancer Drugs.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Repression of LKB1 byCell reports. Medicine · 2020
    Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M V C L AppleyardCentre for Oncology and Molecular Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK. m.v.c.l.appleyard@dundee.ac.uk
K E Murray
P J Coates
S Wullschleger
S E Bray
N M Kernohan
S Fleming
D R Alessi
A M Thompson
University of Dundee · GBThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U127070193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObservations that diabetics treated with biguanide drugs have a reduced risk of developing cancer have prompted an enthusiasm for these agents as anti-cancer therapies. We sought to determine the efficacy of the biguanide phenformin in the chemoprophylaxis and in the treatment of oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive MCF7 and receptor triple-negative MDAMB231 xenografts in immunocompromised mice. We also compared the efficacy of phenformin and metformin in the treatment of MDAMB231.

methodsImmunocompromised mice were divided into groups: (1) phenformin administered for 2 weeks prior to cell injection; (2) established tumours treated with phenformin; (3) established tumours treated with metformin (only for MDAMB231 tumours); (4) untreated controls. Post-treatment tumours, liver and spleen were harvested for further analysis.

resultsPhenformin significantly inhibited both the development and growth of MCF7 and MDAMB231 tumours, and for MDAMB231 at greater efficacy than metformin without murine toxicity. The number of mitotic figures was significantly fewer in xenografts treated with phenformin compared with controls. Results suggested that the mechanism of action of phenformin in vivo is consistent with AMPK activation.

conclusionPhenformin has clinical potential as an antineoplastic agent and should be considered for clinical trials both in ER-positive and triple-negative breast cancer.

Indexed as

Adenylate KinaseAnimalsAnticarcinogenic AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorEnzyme ActivationFemaleHistonesHumansKi-67 AntigenLiverMetforminMiceMice, NudePhenforminAdenylate KinaseAnticarcinogenic AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsHistonesKi-67 AntigenMetforminPARP1 protein, humanPhenforminPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases

Identifiers

PMID22361631
PMCPMC3304424
OpenAlexW1977613875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.