Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22361353›Full record

ReviewTrends in immunology2012

CD8 T cell quiescence revisited.

Sara E Hamilton, Stephen C Jameson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. AGO2 silences mobile transposons in the nucleus of quiescent cells.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. The CD8α-PILRα interaction maintains CD8Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Self-Renewing Islet TCF1Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2021
    Article
  15. STAT1 maintains naïve CD8Science advances · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Running to Stand Still: Naive CD8International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sara E HamiltonCenter for Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA. hamil062@umn.edu
Stephen C Jameson

Funding

TRAINING GRANT IN MICROBIOLOGY/CANCER RESEARCHT32CA009138 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Scott M. Dehm · 1985 to 2026
$11.3M
T cell homeostasisR37AI038903 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI JAMESON, STEPHEN C · 2006 to 2015
$3.6M
Homeostatic Proliferation and Memory CD8 T CellsR01AI075168 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI JAMESON, STEPHEN C · 2008 to 2016
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009138NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI075168NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI038903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naïve T cells are typically considered to be in a default state of quiescence, whereas memory T cells undergo basal proliferation and quickly exhibit effector responses when stimulated. Over the past few years, however, a more complex picture has emerged, with evidence that naïve T cell quiescence is actively enforced, and that heterogeneity among naïve T cells influences their capacity to escape quiescence in response to homeostatic cues. Furthermore, the active state of memory T cells may also be instructed, requiring contact with dendritic cells to avoid reversion to quiescence. Here, we discuss these new findings and propose that there is much more flexibility in the quiescent state of naïve and memory T cells than previously thought.

Indexed as

HomeostasisAnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesHumansImmunity, InnateImmunologic MemoryModels, Immunological

Identifiers

PMID22361353
PMCPMC3348359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.