Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22360580›Full record

ArticleBiosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science2012

Perspectives of immunization program managers on 2009-10 H1N1 vaccination in the United States: a national survey.

Allison T Chamberlain, Katherine Seib, Katelyn Wells, Claire Hannan, Walter A Orenstein, Ellen A S Whitney, Alan R Hinman, Ruth L Berkelman, Saad B Omer

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. ReadyVax: A new mobile vaccine information app.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Allison T ChamberlainEmory University Preparedness and Emergency Response Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. allison.chamberlain@emory.edu
Katherine Seib
Katelyn Wells
Claire Hannan
Walter A Orenstein
Ellen A S Whitney
Alan R Hinman
Ruth L Berkelman
Saad B Omer
Emory University · US

Funding

OPHPR CDC HHS 5P01TP000300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In June and July 2010, we conducted a national internet-based survey of 64 city, state, and territorial immunization program managers (IPMs) to assess their experiences in managing the 2009-10 H1N1 influenza vaccination campaign. Fifty-four (84%) of the managers or individuals responsible for an immunization program responded to the survey. To manage the campaign, 76% indicated their health department activated an incident command system (ICS) and 49% used an emergency operations center (EOC). Forty percent indicated they shared the leadership of the campaign with their state-level emergency preparedness program. The managers' perceptions of the helpfulness of the emergency preparedness staff was higher when they had collaborated with the emergency preparedness program on actual or simulated mass vaccination events within the previous 2 years. Fifty-seven percent found their pandemic influenza plan helpful, and those programs that mandated that vaccine providers enter data into their jurisdiction's immunization information system (IIS) were more likely than those who did not mandate data entry to rate their IIS as valuable for facilitating registration of nontraditional providers (42% vs. 25%, p<0.05) and tracking recalled influenza vaccine (50% vs. 38%, p<0.05). Results suggest that ICS and EOC structures, pandemic influenza plans, collaborations with emergency preparedness partners during nonemergencies, and expanded use of IIS can enhance immunization programs' ability to successfully manage a large-scale vaccination campaign. Maintaining the close working relationships developed between state-level immunization and emergency preparedness programs during the H1N1 influenza vaccination campaign will be especially important as states prepare for budget cuts in the coming years.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeDisaster PlanningHealth Care SurveysHumansInfluenza, HumanMass VaccinationProgram EvaluationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID22360580
PMCPMC3316479
OpenAlexW1987989892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.