Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22360484›Full record

ReviewCurrent medicinal chemistry2012

Reactive oxygen production induced by the gut microbiota: pharmacotherapeutic implications.

R M Jones, J W Mercante, A S Neish

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current medicinal chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 221 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R M JonesEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
J W Mercante
A S Neish
Emory University · US

Funding

IRACDA Fellowships in Research and Science Training (FIRST)K12GM000680 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, LOU ANN S, MCCARTY, NAEL A · 2000 to 2024
$41.2M
Microbial Influence on Mucosal HomeostasisR01AI064462 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NEISH, ANDREW S · 2006 to 2022
$5.5M
PATHOBIOLOGY OF MUCOSAL/EPITHELIAL DISEASET32DK007771 · NIDDK · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NEISH, ANDREW S · 1999 to 2015
$2.0M
Intestinal cell response to bacterial apoptotic signalsR01DK071604 · NIDDK · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NEISH, ANDREW S · 2007 to 2011
$1.5M
Pathogenic effector protein modulation of host innate immune signalingK01DK081481 · NIDDK · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JONES, RHEINALLT MELFYN · 2008 to 2010
$345k
Salmonella protein AvrA promotes survival and dissemination within the hostR03DK089304 · NIDDK · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JONES, RHEINALLT MELFYN · 2010 to 2011
$154k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI064462NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK081481NIDDK NIH HHS K01DK081481NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK071604NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK071604NIDDK NIH HHS R03 DK089304NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007771NIGMS NIH HHS 5K12GM000680NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM000680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The resident prokaryotic microbiota of the mammalian intestine influences diverse homeostatic functions, including regulation of cellular growth, maintenance of barrier function, and modulation of immune responses. However, it is unknown how commensal prokaryotic organisms mechanistically influence eukaryotic signaling networks. Recent data has demonstrated that gut epithelia contacted by enteric commensal bacteria rapidly generate reactive oxygen species (ROS). While the induced generation of ROS via stimulation of formyl peptide receptors is a cardinal feature of the cellular response of phagocytes to pathogenic or commensal bacteria, evidence is accumulating that ROS are also similarly elicited in other cell types, including intestinal epithelia, in response to microbial signals. Additionally, ROS have been shown to serve as critical second messengers in multiple signal transduction pathways stimulated by proinflammatory cytokines and growth factors. This physiologically-generated ROS is known to participate in cellular signaling via the rapid and transient oxidative inactivation of a defined class of sensor proteins bearing oxidant-sensitive thiol groups. These proteins include tyrosine phosphatases that serve as regulators of MAP kinase pathways, cytoskeletal dynamics, as well as components involved in control of ubiquitination-mediated NF-κB activation. Consistently, microbial-elicited ROS has been shown to mediate increased cellular proliferation and motility and to modulate innate immune signaling. These results demonstrate how enteric microbiota influence regulatory networks of the mammalian intestinal epithelia. We hypothesize that many of the known effects of the normal microbiota on intestinal physiology, and potential beneficial effects of candidate probiotic bacteria, may be at least partially mediated by this ROS-dependent mechanism.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaHumansIntestinal MucosaMetagenomeMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesNF-kappa BProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesReactive Oxygen SpeciesReceptors, Formyl PeptideSignal TransductionMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesNF-kappa BProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesReactive Oxygen SpeciesReceptors, Formyl Peptide

Identifiers

PMID22360484
PMCPMC4269156
OpenAlexW2098925292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.