ArticlePloS one2012
The two different isoforms of the RSC chromatin remodeling complex play distinct roles in DNA damage responses.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- The toxicity of neodymium and genome-scale genetic screen of neodymium-sensitive gene deletion mutations in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Review
- The chromatin remodeler Chd1 supports MRX and Exo1 functions in resection of DNA double-strand breaks.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- A cytoskeletal function for PBRM1 reading methylated microtubules.Science advances · 2021Article
- A Conserved Histone H3-H4 Interface Regulates DNA Damage Tolerance and Homologous Recombination during the Recovery from Replication Stress.Molecular and cellular biology · 2021Article
- Specialization of the chromatin remodeler RSC to mobilize partially-unwrapped nucleosomes.eLife · 2020Article
- Sth1, the Key Subunit of the RSC Chromatin Remodeling Complex, Is Essential in Maintaining Chromosomal Integrity and Mediating High Fidelity Chromosome Segregation in the Human Fungal PathogenFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- DNA Repair: The Search for Homology.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2018Review
- The SWI/SNF ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeler promotes resection initiation at a DNA double-strand break in yeast.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Patching Broken DNA: Nucleosome Dynamics and the Repair of DNA Breaks.Journal of molecular biology · 2016Review
- A Double-Barrel Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) System to Quantify 96 Interactomes per Day.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2015Article
- Interplay between histone H3 lysine 56 deacetylation and chromatin modifiers in response to DNA damage.Genetics · 2015Article
- A moonlighting metabolic protein influences repair at DNA double-stranded breaks.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- ATM-mediated phosphorylation of the chromatin remodeling enzyme BRG1 modulates DNA double-strand break repair.Oncogene · 2015Article
- NuA4 initiates dynamic histone H4 acetylation to promote high-fidelity sister chromatid recombination at postreplication gaps.Molecular cell · 2014Article
- Chromatin remodelling complex RSC promotes base excision repair in chromatin of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.DNA repair · 2014Article
- BAF180 promotes cohesion and prevents genome instability and aneuploidy.Cell reports · 2014Article
- A UV-induced genetic network links the RSC complex to nucleotide excision repair and shows dose-dependent rewiring.Cell reports · 2013Article
- The BAH domain of Rsc2 is a histone H3 binding domain.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The RSC chromatin remodeling complex has been implicated in contributing to DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in a number of studies. Both survival and levels of H2A phosphorylation in response to damage are reduced in the absence of RSC. Importantly, there is evidence for two isoforms of this complex, defined by the presence of either Rsc1 or Rsc2. Here, we investigated whether the two isoforms of RSC provide distinct contributions to DNA damage responses. First, we established that the two isoforms of RSC differ in the presence of Rsc1 or Rsc2 but otherwise have the same subunit composition. We found that both rsc1 and rsc2 mutant strains have intact DNA damage-induced checkpoint activity and transcriptional induction. In addition, both strains show reduced non-homologous end joining activity and have a similar spectrum of DSB repair junctions, suggesting perhaps that the two complexes provide the same functions. However, the hypersensitivity of a rsc1 strain cannot be complemented with an extra copy of RSC2, and likewise, the hypersensitivity of the rsc2 strain remains unchanged when an additional copy of RSC1 is present, indicating that the two proteins are unable to functionally compensate for one another in DNA damage responses. Rsc1, but not Rsc2, is required for nucleosome sliding flanking a DNA DSB. Interestingly, while swapping the domains from Rsc1 into the Rsc2 protein does not compromise hypersensitivity to DNA damage suggesting they are functionally interchangeable, the BAH domain from Rsc1 confers upon Rsc2 the ability to remodel chromatin at a DNA break. These data demonstrate that, despite the similarity between Rsc1 and Rsc2, the two different isoforms of RSC provide distinct functions in DNA damage responses, and that at least part of the functional specificity is dictated by the BAH domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.