Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22359496›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2012

Noise and robustness in phyllotaxis.

Vincent Mirabet, Fabrice Besnard, Teva Vernoux, Arezki Boudaoud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Computational Models of Auxin-Driven Patterning in Shoots.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Fibonacci spirals may not need the Golden Angle.Quantitative plant biology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Symmetry and its transition in phyllotaxis.Journal of plant research · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Phyllotactic patterning of gerbera flower heads.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Recurrent requirement for the mDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Phyllotactic regularity requires the Paf1 complex inDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent MirabetLaboratoire Joliot-Curie, CNRS, ENS, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Fabrice Besnard
Teva Vernoux
Arezki Boudaoud
Laboratoire Reproduction et Développement des Plantes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A striking feature of vascular plants is the regular arrangement of lateral organs on the stem, known as phyllotaxis. The most common phyllotactic patterns can be described using spirals, numbers from the Fibonacci sequence and the golden angle. This rich mathematical structure, along with the experimental reproduction of phyllotactic spirals in physical systems, has led to a view of phyllotaxis focusing on regularity. However all organisms are affected by natural stochastic variability, raising questions about the effect of this variability on phyllotaxis and the achievement of such regular patterns. Here we address these questions theoretically using a dynamical system of interacting sources of inhibitory field. Previous work has shown that phyllotaxis can emerge deterministically from the self-organization of such sources and that inhibition is primarily mediated by the depletion of the plant hormone auxin through polarized transport. We incorporated stochasticity in the model and found three main classes of defects in spiral phyllotaxis--the reversal of the handedness of spirals, the concomitant initiation of organs and the occurrence of distichous angles--and we investigated whether a secondary inhibitory field filters out defects. Our results are consistent with available experimental data and yield a prediction of the main source of stochasticity during organogenesis. Our model can be related to cellular parameters and thus provides a framework for the analysis of phyllotactic mutants at both cellular and tissular levels. We propose that secondary fields associated with organogenesis, such as other biochemical signals or mechanical forces, are important for the robustness of phyllotaxis. More generally, our work sheds light on how a target pattern can be achieved within a noisy background.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArabidopsisBiological TransportComputational BiologyDiffusionFlowersIndoleacetic AcidsModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsPlant ShootsPlant StemsReproducibility of ResultsSignal TransductionStochastic ProcessesIndoleacetic AcidsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22359496
PMCPMC3280957
OpenAlexW1968558936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.