ArticlePLoS computational biology2012
Joint analysis of multiple metagenomic samples.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Four functional profiles for fibre and mucin metabolism in the human gut microbiome.Microbiome · 2023Article
- Evaluating the number of different genomes in a metagenome by means of the compositional spectra approach.PloS one · 2020Article
- A framework for space-efficient read clustering in metagenomic samples.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Inferring Aggregated Functional Traits from Metagenomic Data Using Constrained Non-negative Matrix Factorization: Application to Fiber Degradation in the Human Gut Microbiota.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Accurate, multi-kb reads resolve complex populations and detect rare microorganisms.Genome research · 2015Article
- Taxator-tk: precise taxonomic assignment of metagenomes by fast approximation of evolutionary neighborhoods.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- Partial Least Squares Regression Can Aid in Detecting Differential Abundance of Multiple Features in Sets of Metagenomic Samples.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
- Exploration and retrieval of whole-metagenome sequencing samples.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
- Analytical tools and databases for metagenomics in the next-generation sequencing era.Genomics & informatics · 2013Review
- Explaining microbial phenotypes on a genomic scale: GWAS for microbes.Briefings in functional genomics · 2013Review
- Reconstructing the genomic content of microbiome taxa through shotgun metagenomic deconvolution.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
- Current opportunities and challenges in microbial metagenome analysis--a bioinformatic perspective.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The availability of metagenomic sequencing data, generated by sequencing DNA pooled from multiple microbes living jointly, has increased sharply in the last few years with developments in sequencing technology. Characterizing the contents of metagenomic samples is a challenging task, which has been extensively attempted by both supervised and unsupervised techniques, each with its own limitations. Common to practically all the methods is the processing of single samples only; when multiple samples are sequenced, each is analyzed separately and the results are combined. In this paper we propose to perform a combined analysis of a set of samples in order to obtain a better characterization of each of the samples, and provide two applications of this principle. First, we use an unsupervised probabilistic mixture model to infer hidden components shared across metagenomic samples. We incorporate the model in a novel framework for studying association of microbial sequence elements with phenotypes, analogous to the genome-wide association studies performed on human genomes: We demonstrate that stratification may result in false discoveries of such associations, and that the components inferred by the model can be used to correct for this stratification. Second, we propose a novel read clustering (also termed "binning") algorithm which operates on multiple samples simultaneously, leveraging on the assumption that the different samples contain the same microbial species, possibly in different proportions. We show that integrating information across multiple samples yields more precise binning on each of the samples. Moreover, for both applications we demonstrate that given a fixed depth of coverage, the average per-sample performance generally increases with the number of sequenced samples as long as the per-sample coverage is high enough.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.