Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22359240›Full record

Trial reportMaternal and child health journal2013

Impact of financial and educational interventions on maternity care: results of cluster randomized trials in rural China, CHIMACA.

Elina Hemminki, Qian Long, Wei-Hong Zhang, Zhuochun Wu, Joanna Raven, Fangbiao Tao, Hong Yan, Yang Wang, Reija Klemetti, Tuohong Zhang and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Maternal and child health journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Elina HemminkiNational Institute for Health and Welfare, Lintulahdenkuja 4, P.O. Box 30, 00271 Helsinki, Finland. elina.hemminki@thl.fi
Qian Long
Wei-Hong Zhang
Zhuochun Wu
Joanna Raven
Fangbiao Tao
Hong Yan
Yang Wang
Reija Klemetti
Tuohong Zhang
Elena Regushevskaya
Shenglan Tang
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIAnhui Medical University · CNChongqing Public Health Medical Center · CNDuke University · USFudan University · CNGhent University Hospital · BELiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBPeking University · CNXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To report on the design and basic outcomes of three interventions aimed at improving the use and quality of maternity care in rural China: financial interventions, training in clinical skills, and training in health education. Community-based cluster randomized trials were carried out in one central and two western provinces between 2007 and 2009: (1) financial interventions covered part of women's costs for prenatal and postnatal care, (2) training of midwives in clinical skills was given by local maternity care experts in two- or three-group training courses, (3) health education training for midwives and village doctors were given by local experts in health education in two- or three-group training courses. A survey was conducted in a stratified random sample of women who had been pregnant in the study period. 73% of women (n = 3,673) were interviewed within 1-10 months of giving birth. Outcomes were compared by the different intervention and control groups. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated by logistic regression to adjust for varying maternal characteristics. Most of the differences found between the groups were small and some varied between provinces. The financial intervention did not influence the number of visits, but was associated with increased caesarean sections and a decrease in many ultrasound tests. The clinical intervention influenced some indicators of care content. There was no consistent finding for the health education intervention. Financial and training interventions have the potential to improve maternity care, but better implementation is required. Unintended consequences, including overuse of technology, are possible.

Indexed as

AdultChinaCluster AnalysisCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicMaternal Health ServicesMidwiferyPregnancyPrenatal CareRural Population

Identifiers

PMID22359240
OpenAlexW2025124678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.