ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2012
An assessment of computational methods for obtaining structural information of moderately flexible biomolecules from ion mobility spectrometry.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Glycobiology.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Investigating Differences in Gas-Phase Conformations of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Sodiated Epimers using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry and Theoretical Modeling.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2017Article
- Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Sodiated Multimers of Steroid Epimers with Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2017Article
- Towards the Analysis of High Molecular Weight Proteins and Protein complexes using TIMS-MS.International journal for ion mobility spectrometry : official publication of the International Society for Ion Mobility Spectrometry · 2016Article
- Comparison of Experimental and Calculated Ion Mobilities of Small Molecules in Air.Journal of analytical methods in chemistry · 2016Article
- Distance geometry protocol to generate conformations of natural products to structurally interpret ion mobility-mass spectrometry collision cross sections.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2014Article
- Molecular simulation-based structural prediction of protein complexes in mass spectrometry: the human insulin dimer.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
- Chemical structure identification in metabolomics: computational modeling of experimental features.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2013Review
- MolFind: a software package enabling HPLC/MS-based identification of unknown chemical structures.Analytical chemistry · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When utilized in conjunction with modeling, the collision cross section (Ω) from ion mobility spectrometry can be used to deduce the gas phase structures of analyte ions. Gas phase conformations are determined computationally, and their Ω calculated using an approximate method, the results of which are compared with experimental data. Though prior work has focused upon rigid small molecules or large biomolecules, correlation of computational and experimental Ω has not been thoroughly examined for analytes with intermediate conformational flexibility, which constitute a large fraction of the molecules studied in the field. Here, the computational paradigm for calculating Ω has been tested for the tripeptides WGY, YGW, and YWG (Y = tyrosine, W = tryptophan, G = glycine). Experimental data indicate that Ω(exp) (YWG) > Ω(exp) (WGY) ≈ Ω(exp) (YGW). The energy distributions of conformations obtained from tiers of simulated annealing molecular dynamics (SAMD) were analyzed using a wide array of density functionals. These quantum mechanical energy distributions do not agree with the MD data, which leads to structural differences between the SAMD and DFT conformations. The latter structures are obtained by reoptimization of the SAMD geometries, and are the only suite of structures that reproduce the experimental trend in analyte separability. In the absence of fitting Lennard Jones potentials that reproduce experimental results for the Trajectory Method, the Exact Hard Sphere Scattering method produced numerical values that are in best agreement with the experimental cross sections obtained in He drift gas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22359091What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.