Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22357917›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Renal physiology2012

Reversal of renal dysfunction by targeted administration of VEGF into the stenotic kidney: a novel potential therapeutic approach.

Alejandro R Chade, Silvia Kelsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Renal physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Novel therapeutic strategies for renovascular disease.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. VEGF therapy for the kidney: emerging strategies.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2018
    Review
  16. A translational model of chronic kidney disease in swine.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alejandro R ChadeDept. of Physiology and Biophysics, Dept. of Medicine, Univ. of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N. State St., Jackson, MS 39216-4505, USA. achade@umc.edu
Silvia Kelsen
University of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

STRUCTURAL VASCULAR ADAPTATION OF THE MICROCIRCULATIONP01HL051971 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER · PI HESTER, ROBERT L · 1993 to 2018
$39.4M
Microcirculation in Renovascular HypertensionR01HL095638 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI CHADE, ALEJANDRO ROBERTO · 2010 to 2021
$3.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL 051971NHLBI NIH HHS HL095638NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL095638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal microvascular (MV) damage and loss contribute to the progression of renal injury in renovascular disease (RVD). Whether a targeted intervention in renal microcirculation could reverse renal damage is unknown. We hypothesized that intrarenal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy will reverse renal dysfunction and decrease renal injury in experimental RVD. Unilateral renal artery stenosis (RAS) was induced in 14 pigs, as a surrogate of chronic RVD. Six weeks later, renal blood flow (RBF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were quantified in vivo in the stenotic kidney using multidetector computed tomography (CT). Then, intrarenal rhVEGF-165 or vehicle was randomly administered into the stenotic kidneys (n = 7/group), they were observed for 4 additional wk, in vivo studies were repeated, and then renal MV density was quantified by 3D micro-CT, and expression of angiogenic factors and fibrosis was determined. RBF and GFR, MV density, and renal expression of VEGF and downstream mediators such as p-ERK 1/2, Akt, and eNOS were significantly reduced after 6 and at 10 wk of untreated RAS compared with normal controls. Remarkably, administration of VEGF at 6 wk normalized RBF (from 393.6 ± 50.3 to 607.0 ± 45.33 ml/min, P < 0.05 vs. RAS) and GFR (from 43.4 ± 3.4 to 66.6 ± 10.3 ml/min, P < 0.05 vs. RAS) at 10 wk, accompanied by increased angiogenic signaling, augmented renal MV density, and attenuated renal scarring. This study shows promising therapeutic effects of a targeted renal intervention, using an established clinically relevant large-animal model of chronic RAS. It also implies that disruption of renal MV integrity and function plays a pivotal role in the progression of renal injury in the stenotic kidney. Furthermore, it shows a high level of plasticity of renal microvessels to a single-dose VEGF-targeted intervention after established renal injury, supporting promising renoprotective effects of a novel potential therapeutic intervention to treat chronic RVD.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAnimalsBlood PressureCreatinineLLC-PK1 CellsNeovascularization, PhysiologicRecovery of FunctionRenal Artery ObstructionRenal CirculationReninSus scrofaSwineVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AX-Ray MicrotomographyCreatinineReninVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID22357917
PMCPMC3362061
OpenAlexW2326573810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.